On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
wrote:
> On 2014-07-29 13:08, Nick Krause wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
>>> wrote:
On 2014-07-28 11:57, Nick Krause wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 201
On 2014-07-29 13:08, Nick Krause wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
>> wrote:
>>> On 2014-07-28 11:57, Nick Krause wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Nick Krause
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 a
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
> wrote:
>> On 2014-07-28 11:57, Nick Krause wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Nick Krause
>>> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
wrote:
> On 2014-07-28 11:57, Nick Krause wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Nick Krause
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
>>> wrote:
On 07/27/2014 11:21 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
> On Sun, Jul
On 2014-07-28 11:57, Nick Krause wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Nick Krause
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
>> wrote:
>>> On 07/27/2014 11:21 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
wrote:
> On 07/2
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Nick Krause wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
> wrote:
>> On 07/27/2014 11:21 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
>>> wrote:
On 07/27/2014 04:47 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
> This may b
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
wrote:
> On 07/27/2014 11:21 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
>> wrote:
>>> On 07/27/2014 04:47 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
This may be a bad idea , but compression in brtfs seems to be only
u
On 07/27/2014 11:21 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
> wrote:
>> On 07/27/2014 04:47 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
>>> This may be a bad idea , but compression in brtfs seems to be only
>>> using one core to compress.
>>> Depending on the CPU used and the amo
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 11:21:53PM -0400, Nick Krause wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
> wrote:
> > On 07/27/2014 04:47 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
> >> This may be a bad idea , but compression in brtfs seems to be only
> >> using one core to compress.
> >> Depending on th
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
wrote:
> On 07/27/2014 04:47 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
>> This may be a bad idea , but compression in brtfs seems to be only
>> using one core to compress.
>> Depending on the CPU used and the amount of cores in the CPU we can
>> make this much fa
On 07/27/2014 04:47 PM, Nick Krause wrote:
> This may be a bad idea , but compression in brtfs seems to be only
> using one core to compress.
> Depending on the CPU used and the amount of cores in the CPU we can
> make this much faster
> with multiple cores. This seems bad by my reading at least I
This may be a bad idea , but compression in brtfs seems to be only
using one core to compress.
Depending on the CPU used and the amount of cores in the CPU we can
make this much faster
with multiple cores. This seems bad by my reading at least I would
recommend for writing compression
we write a fu
12 matches
Mail list logo