On Sunday 17 April 2005 22:04, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Willy Tarreau schrieb:
> > Well, if the application does not touch most of the data, either it
> > is playing as a relay, and the data will at least have to be copied,
> > or it will play as a client or server which reads from/writes to disk,
David S. Miller wrote:
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:29:14 +0300
Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
TOEs can remove the data copy on receive. In some applications (notably
storage), where the application does not touch most of the data, this is
a significant advantage that cannot be achieved in a so
On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 12:08:41AM -0400, Kyle Moffett wrote:
(...)
> What I think would be _much_ more useful is a generic low-power
> multi-proc MIPS/PPC system on a PCI card with a certain amount of
> RAM, etc that could be programmed at runtime by the master CPU.
> Then you lose none of the f
On Apr 17, 2005, at 19:37, Horst von Brand wrote:
Andreas Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Alacritech developed a new chip for NIC's
(http://www.alacritech.com/html/tech_review.html), which makes it
possible
to take away the TCP stack from the host CPU. Therefore, the host CPU
has
more performa
Andreas Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Alacritech developed a new chip for NIC's
> (http://www.alacritech.com/html/tech_review.html), which makes it possible
> to take away the TCP stack from the host CPU. Therefore, the host CPU has
> more performance for the applications according Alacritec
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 13:29:14 +0300
Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TOEs can remove the data copy on receive. In some applications (notably
> storage), where the application does not touch most of the data, this is
> a significant advantage that cannot be achieved in a software-only
> solut
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> maybe one day you would be able to offload your firewall and policy
> router too :)
There are quite a few filtering NICs out there.
Greetings
Bernd
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EM
Willy Tarreau schrieb:
> Hello !
>
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 01:29:14PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 12:07, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> > On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 10:17 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
>> > > Hello!
>> > >
>> > > Alacritech developed a new chip for NIC's
>> > > (ht
On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 13:57, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >
> > TOEs can remove the data copy on receive. In some applications (notably
> > storage), where the application does not touch most of the data, this is
> > a significant advantage that cannot be achieved in a software-only
> > solution.
>
On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 14:30, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > TOEs can remove the data copy on receive. In some applications (notably
> > storage), where the application does not touch most of the data, this is
> > a significant advantage that cannot be achieved in a software-only
> > solution.
>
> Well,
Hello !
On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 01:29:14PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 12:07, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 10:17 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > Alacritech developed a new chip for NIC's
> > > (http://www.alacritech.com/html/tech_r
>
> TOEs can remove the data copy on receive. In some applications (notably
> storage), where the application does not touch most of the data, this is
> a significant advantage that cannot be achieved in a software-only
> solution.
other solutions can too. Search the archives for posts from Dave
On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 12:07, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 10:17 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > Alacritech developed a new chip for NIC's
> > (http://www.alacritech.com/html/tech_review.html), which makes it possible
> > to take away the TCP stack from the host
On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 10:17 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Alacritech developed a new chip for NIC's
> (http://www.alacritech.com/html/tech_review.html), which makes it possible
> to take away the TCP stack from the host CPU. Therefore, the host CPU has
> more performance for the appl
Hello!
Alacritech developed a new chip for NIC's
(http://www.alacritech.com/html/tech_review.html), which makes it possible
to take away the TCP stack from the host CPU. Therefore, the host CPU has
more performance for the applications according Alacritech.
This sounds interesting.
Unfortunately
15 matches
Mail list logo
