Re: Mem detection problem

2001-02-08 Thread Adam Schrotenboer
Dunlap, Randy wrote: >> From: Adam Schrotenboer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> >> This is actually a repost of a problem that received few >> serious replies (IMNSHO). > > > Well, I claim not to have ignored it. > I have gone thru the entire patch-2.4.1 file and can't see > anything there that

RE: Mem detection problem

2001-02-08 Thread Dunlap, Randy
> From: Adam Schrotenboer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > This is actually a repost of a problem that received few > serious replies (IMNSHO). Well, I claim not to have ignored it. I have gone thru the entire patch-2.4.1 file and can't see anything there that would cause what you are seeing. Yo

Mem detection problem

2001-02-08 Thread Adam Schrotenboer
This is a repost of a problem that received few serious replies (IMNSHO). Basically 2.4.0 detects 192 MB(maybe 191, but big whoop) of memory. This is correct. However, 2.4.1-ac6 (as did Linus-blessed 2.4.1) detects 64. The problem is simple. 2.4.1 and later for some reason (with my motherboard/

Re: Mem detection problem

2001-02-08 Thread Michael Hobgood
On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 11:52:54AM -0500, Adam Schrotenboer wrote: > This is actually a repost of a problem that received few serious replies > (IMNSHO). > > Basically 2.4.0 detects 192 MB(maybe 191, but big whoop) of memory. This > is correct. However, 2.4.1-ac6 (as did Linus-blessed 2.4.1) de

Mem detection problem

2001-02-08 Thread Adam Schrotenboer
This is actually a repost of a problem that received few serious replies (IMNSHO). Basically 2.4.0 detects 192 MB(maybe 191, but big whoop) of memory. This is correct. However, 2.4.1-ac6 (as did Linus-blessed 2.4.1) detects 64. The problem is simple. 2.4.1 and later for some reason uses bios-8