Re: Matrox Marvell G400

2001-02-06 Thread Xavier Bestel
Le 05 Feb 2001 12:36:37 -0500, Gregory Maxwell a écrit : > On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 11:31:57AM -0500, Wakko Warner wrote: > > How well is this card supported for it's capture capabilities and dual head? > > Capture and dual head are almost totally unsupported without using a > proprietary, binary

Re: Matrox Marvell G400

2001-02-06 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 6 Feb 01 at 9:36, David Woodhouse wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > And if you insist on X, you can run first head through mga with > > usefbdev /dev/fb0 with hwcursor off, and secondary head through fbdev / > > dev/fb1. But it is not supported by me (and neither by XFree guys > > AFAIK, n

Re: Matrox Marvell G400

2001-02-06 Thread David Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > And if you insist on X, you can run first head through mga with > usefbdev /dev/fb0 with hwcursor off, and secondary head through fbdev / > dev/fb1. But it is not supported by me (and neither by XFree guys > AFAIK, not even talking about Matrox support guys) - I support

Re: Matrox Marvell G400

2001-02-05 Thread Ricky Beam
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Alan Olsen wrote: >The capture features are undocumented and unsupported (to my knowledge). (your knowledge is incorrect.) >As far as I have heard, the Rainbow Runner card is not supported in Linux >and Matrox has no plans of doing it. Unsupported by whom? Matrox? That woul

Re: Matrox Marvell G400

2001-02-05 Thread Alan Olsen
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Wakko Warner wrote: > How well is this card supported for it's capture capabilities and dual head? The capture features are undocumented and unsupported (to my knowledge). As far as I have heard, the Rainbow Runner card is not supported in Linux and Matrox has no plans of doi

Re: Matrox Marvell G400

2001-02-05 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 5 Feb 01 at 12:36, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 11:31:57AM -0500, Wakko Warner wrote: > > How well is this card supported for it's capture capabilities and dual head? > > Capture and dual head are almost totally unsupported without using a > proprietary, binary only driver

Re: Matrox Marvell G400

2001-02-05 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 11:31:57AM -0500, Wakko Warner wrote: > How well is this card supported for it's capture capabilities and dual head? Capture and dual head are almost totally unsupported without using a proprietary, binary only driver chunk which will soundly place your system as 'unsuppor

Matrox Marvell G400

2001-02-05 Thread Wakko Warner
How well is this card supported for it's capture capabilities and dual head? -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http:/