Richard Purdie wrote:
Pierre Ossman:
I, personally, would really like to see SD support included in the
main kernel. But I can also fully understand if that's not currently
possible.
I think the way forward is for someone to propose a patch. Your code
sounds the most advanced but Ian or myself m
Pierre Ossman:
I fail to see what this delay does. A few lines further down you have a
mmc_delay which you have removed. That delay was added just to give slow
cards enough time to power up.
I hadn't realised that delay had been added. It wasn't present in the older
code I was working against an
Richard Purdie wrote:
For reference, I got the 512MB SD card working by adding an mdelay(3)
into the middle of mmc_send_op_cond(). Anything shorter and it marks
the card as bad...
I fail to see what this delay does. A few lines further down you have a
mmc_delay which you have removed. That delay
On Sul, 2005-01-16 at 23:17, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On the subject of patents, the whole idea behind SD is that there aren't
> patents as for a patent to exist, we'd have some publicly available
> information on how SD works. We're not breaking any copyrights as I nobody
> involved with this co
Russell King:
> 2. Card Initialisation Problems
>
> One of my cards works fine. The other works when I enable debug and
> doesn't when I don't. I suspect the delay while it does a printk gives
> something time to happen that doesn't normally when running at full
> speed!
Different cards behave
Ian Molton wrote:
The toshiba controller appears to want to be told when an ACMD is
issued, compared to a normal CMD.
Seems very strange since there's no change in what goes over the wire.
I think the controller (for some odd reason) keeps some extra internal
state.
Have you tried using it withou
Pierre Ossman wrote:
Ian Molton wrote:
Afraid everything gets routed to the same account in the end anyway. I
checked the logs and the problem is that your mail server has a HELO
that differs from its IP
I've sent mail to my ISP re that. cheers.
I've had the same idea. But I think it will be dif
Ian Molton wrote:
I've been getting errors replying to you but had no alternative
address to use. perhaps you could mail me from another account ?
Afraid everything gets routed to the same account in the end anyway. I
checked the logs and the problem is that your mail server has a HELO
that dif
8 matches
Mail list logo