On Thursday 24 January 2008 08:16 Andi Kleen wrote:
> Do you perhaps have a kernel compiled without CONFIG_HIGHPTE? Normally
> __pte_alloc should be able to allocate highmem unless that option is
> not set. Before HIGHPTE was implemented running out of low memory
> due to page tables was pretty com
Matthias Wolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jan 17 23:31:58 franklin72 kernel: sshd invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd0,
> order=0, oomkilladj=0
> Jan 17 23:31:58 franklin72 kernel: cat invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x84d0,
> order=0, oomkilladj=0
> Jan 17 23:31:58 franklin72 kernel: [] out_of_me
On Wednesday 23 January 2008 23:06 Andrew Morton wrote:
> Can you please send the full dmesg output from one such oom-killing event?
Jan 17 23:31:58 franklin72 kernel: sshd invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd0,
order=0, oomkilladj=0
Jan 17 23:31:58 franklin72 kernel: cat invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask
> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:32:41 +0100 Matthias Wolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my company is running several servers with kernel 2.6.23.12. This are Dual
> Quad Core servers (CPU Intel) with 16GB RAM using a 32Bit kernel.
> After some days nicely running the oom killer killed our proce
Matthias Wolle gmx.de> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> my company is running several servers with kernel 2.6.23.12. This are Dual
> Quad Core servers (CPU Intel) with 16GB RAM using a 32Bit kernel.
This is a common problem with running 32-bit kernels with more than 8Gb RAM.
(Search the archives and you wil
Hi,
my company is running several servers with kernel 2.6.23.12. This are Dual
Quad Core servers (CPU Intel) with 16GB RAM using a 32Bit kernel.
After some days nicely running the oom killer killed our processes.
Our research discovered that the free low memory was reduced to about 11MB. We
fou
6 matches
Mail list logo
