Re: LogFS take four

2007-06-15 Thread Jörn Engel
On Fri, 15 June 2007 12:37:32 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 08:38:46PM +0200, Jörn Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > This round the patch is split into file-sized hunks. There actually > > seem to be kernel developers not manly enough to digest 6000+ lines of > > c

Re: LogFS take four

2007-06-15 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 08:38:46PM +0200, Jörn Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > This round the patch is split into file-sized hunks. There actually > seem to be kernel developers not manly enough to digest 6000+ lines of > code at once. An I thought I was the only wimp around. > > Again, anyon

Re: LogFS take four

2007-06-04 Thread Jörn Engel
On Mon, 4 June 2007 00:18:21 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Sunday 03 June 2007, Jörn Engel wrote: > > > Unchanged: > > o error handling > > > ... > > Won't happen (unless I get convinced to do otherwise): > > o Change LOGFS_BUG() and LOGFS_BUG_ON() to inline functions > > These are macros fo

Re: LogFS take four

2007-06-03 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Sunday 03 June 2007, Jörn Engel wrote: > Unchanged: > o error handling > ... > Won't happen (unless I get convinced to do otherwise): > o Change LOGFS_BUG() and LOGFS_BUG_ON() to inline functions > These are macros for very much the same reasons BUG() and BUG_ON() are. I wonder how many of

Re: LogFS take four

2007-06-03 Thread Jörn Engel
On Sun, 3 June 2007 21:17:44 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Sun, 2007-06-03 20:38:46 +0200, Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This round the patch is split into file-sized hunks. There actually > > seem to be kernel developers not manly enough to digest 6000+ lines of > > code at onc

Re: LogFS take four

2007-06-03 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Sun, 2007-06-03 20:38:46 +0200, Jörn Engel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This round the patch is split into file-sized hunks. There actually > seem to be kernel developers not manly enough to digest 6000+ lines of > code at once. An I thought I was the only wimp around. Though it would be nice

LogFS take four

2007-06-03 Thread Jörn Engel
This round the patch is split into file-sized hunks. There actually seem to be kernel developers not manly enough to digest 6000+ lines of code at once. An I thought I was the only wimp around. Again, anyone giving comments in the last round is on Cc:. I'll try to respond to comments but the ne