[+cc Arnd]
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Michel Machado wrote:
> On 03/18/2015 06:27 AM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
>> Hi Michel,
>> If you want an example of how to break a fairly medium+
>> code-base/driver, I believe amdkfd is a good example. Originally, I had
>> dumped 80+ patches, but after getti
On 03/18/2015 06:27 AM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> Hi Michel,
> If you want an example of how to break a fairly medium+
> code-base/driver, I believe amdkfd is a good example. Originally, I had
> dumped 80+ patches, but after getting some flames & help from drm devs,
> I rearranged them into a nicely 25
On 03/17/2015 02:25 PM, Michel Machado wrote:
On 03/15/2015 05:37 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:26:46AM -0400, Michel Machado wrote:
On 03/10/2015 01:01 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
From my point of view (far outside the networking world and completely
incompetent to judge the m
On 03/15/2015 06:03 AM, Oded Gabbay wrote:
Hi Michel,
Although I don't know you and I'm not familiar with XIA, I would like to
encourage you to listen to Greg and continue with your efforts to
upstream XIA.
I can tell you, from my recent experience of upstreaming AMD's HSA
driver to drm (amdkfd
On 03/15/2015 05:37 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:26:46AM -0400, Michel Machado wrote:
On 03/10/2015 01:01 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
From my point of view (far outside the networking world and completely
incompetent to judge the merits of XIA), this email seems like a
reasonable
On 03/15/2015 11:37 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:26:46AM -0400, Michel Machado wrote:
On 03/10/2015 01:01 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
From my point of view (far outside the networking world and completely
incompetent to judge the merits of XIA), this email seems like a
reasonab
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 11:26:46AM -0400, Michel Machado wrote:
> On 03/10/2015 01:01 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > From my point of view (far outside the networking world and completely
> >incompetent to judge the merits of XIA), this email seems like a
> >reasonable starting point for a discussion
On 03/10/2015 01:01 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
From my point of view (far outside the networking world and completely
incompetent to judge the merits of XIA), this email seems like a
reasonable starting point for a discussion, and I'm disappointed that
it got shut down so fast. It might not be in
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 12:01 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
>> From my point of view (far outside the networking world and completely
>> incompetent to judge the merits of XIA), this email seems like a
>> reasonable starting point for a discuss
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 12:01 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> From my point of view (far outside the networking world and completely
> incompetent to judge the merits of XIA), this email seems like a
> reasonable starting point for a discussion, and I'm disappointed that
> it got shut down so fast. I
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Michel Machado wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>We have been developing Linux XIA, a new network stack that emphasizes
> evolvability and interoperability, for a couple of years, and it has now
> reached a degree of maturity that allows others to experiment with it. In
>
>>We have been developing Linux XIA, a new network stack that
>> emphasizes evolvability and interoperability, for a couple of years,
>> and it has now reached a degree of maturity that allows others to
>> experiment with it.
>
> From looking at your wiki, "network stack" may have been a poor
Michel Machado wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> We have been developing Linux XIA, a new network stack that
> emphasizes evolvability and interoperability, for a couple of years, and
> it has now reached a degree of maturity that allows others to experiment
> with it.
>From looking at your wiki, "netw
On 03/04/2015 12:49 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 07:31:58PM -0500, Michel Machado wrote:
Hi Daniel,
We're fine with clearly marking Linux XIA as being under staging
as well as helping to define this review process for network stacks.
With regard to staging, the code there is us
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 07:31:58PM -0500, Michel Machado wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> >>We're fine with clearly marking Linux XIA as being under staging
> >>as well as helping to define this review process for network stacks.
> >
> >With regard to staging, the code there is usually horrible and I'm
> >
Hi Daniel,
We're fine with clearly marking Linux XIA as being under staging
as well as helping to define this review process for network stacks.
With regard to staging, the code there is usually horrible and I'm
not sure anyone really looks there, that would mitigate the review
problem to the
Hi Eric,
Linux XIA is not yet mature enough for production, but we do think
that broader exposure will help us to move forward faster, and get
more in tune with the interested community. Thus, we are writing to
ask to merge our work into the Linux kernel.
I took a quick glance at the code
On 03/03/2015 06:29 PM, Michel Machado wrote:
...
We're fine with clearly marking Linux XIA as being under staging as well as
helping to define this review process for network stacks.
With regard to staging, the code there is usually horrible and I'm
not sure anyone really looks there, tha
Michel Machado writes:
>Linux XIA is not yet mature enough for production, but we do think
> that broader exposure will help us to move forward faster, and get
> more in tune with the interested community. Thus, we are writing to
> ask to merge our work into the Linux kernel.
I took a quick
Hi there,
We have been developing Linux XIA, a new network stack that
emphasizes evolvability and interoperability, for a couple of years, and
it has now reached a degree of maturity that allows others to experiment
with it. In addition to the kernel implementation, we have a userland
too
20 matches
Mail list logo
