Friday, August 12, 2016, 7:29:37 PM, you wrote:
> Hi,
> On 12/08/2016 at 19:23:36 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote :
>> L.S.,
>>
>> I'm seeing an issue when using a Linux 4.8-rc1 kernel in a Xen HVM guest (PV
>> guests and dom0 are uneffected). The clock is a
L.S.,
I'm seeing an issue when using a Linux 4.8-rc1 kernel in a Xen HVM guest (PV
guests and dom0 are uneffected). The clock is always set to 31/12/1999 on boot
of the guest, instead of the system clock time.
Bisecting seems to point out commit:
463a86304cae92e10277b47180ac59cf93982e5b
Hi,
On 12/08/2016 at 19:23:36 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote :
> L.S.,
>
> I'm seeing an issue when using a Linux 4.8-rc1 kernel in a Xen HVM guest (PV
> guests and dom0 are uneffected). The clock is always set to 31/12/1999 on
> boot
> of the guest, instead o
Hi all,
As usual, the executive friendly graph is at
http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html :-)
(No merge commits counted, next-20160725 was the first linux-next after
the merge window opened.)
Commits in v4.8-rc1 (relative to v4.7):11618
Commits in next-20160725:
Linus, Eric,
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 14:19:23 -0700
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Eric W. Biederman
> wrote:
> >
> > Booting up v4.8-rc1 in qemu today I ran I ran into this beautiful oops.
> >
> > I am just about to head out the door on vacation until the end of the
> > mo
- Original Message -
> From: "Linus Torvalds"
> To: "Eric W. Biederman" , "Boris Brezillon"
> , "Daniel
> Vetter"
> Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , "Dave Airlie"
> , "David Airlie"
> ,
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Booting up v4.8-rc1 in qemu today I ran I ran into this beautiful oops.
>
> I am just about to head out the door on vacation until the end of the
> month so hopefully I am tossing out enough information to the right
> people.
>
> I have
- Original Message -
> From: "David Binderman"
> To: j...@linux.vnet.ibm.com, "martin petersen" ,
> linux-s...@vger.kernel.org, "Linux
> Kernel Mailing List" , dcb...@hotmail.com
> Sent: Monday, August 8, 2016 9:46:53 AM
> Subject: lin
Hello there,
linux-4.8-rc1/drivers/scsi/sd.c:317]: (style) Unsigned variable 'val'
can't be negative so it is unnecessary to test it.
Source code is
if (val >= 0 && val <= SD_DIF_TYPE3_PROTECTION)
but
unsigned int val;
Suggest new code
if (val <= S
Hello there,
1,
linux-4.8-rc1/drivers/dma/txx9dmac.c:751]: (style) Expression '(X &
0x7f) <= 0x7f' is always true.
Source code is
if (xfer_count > 0x80 &&
(xfer_count & 0x7f) >= 0x7e &&
(xfer_count &am
It's been two weeks, and the merge window for 4.8 is thus closed.
Due to travel last week, I actually still have a few pull requests
pending in my inbox that I just wanted to take another look at before
merging, but the large bulk of the merge window material has been
merged, and I wanted to make
11 matches
Mail list logo
