Re: Linux 3.6-rc4

2012-09-28 Thread Dave Jones
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 05:16:39PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:36:20PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 11:39 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > Al? Please look into this. I'm not entirely sure what's going on, but > > > lockdep complains about

Re: Linux 3.6-rc4

2012-09-21 Thread Dave Jones
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:36:20PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 11:39 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Al? Please look into this. I'm not entirely sure what's going on, but > > lockdep complains about this: > > > > Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: > > >

Re: Linux 3.6-rc4

2012-09-15 Thread Sasha Levin
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 11:39 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> Al? Please look into this. I'm not entirely sure what's going on, but >> lockdep complains about this: >> >> Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: >> >>CPU0

Re: Linux 3.6-rc4

2012-09-10 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 11:39 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Al? Please look into this. I'm not entirely sure what's going on, but > lockdep complains about this: > > Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: > >CPU0CPU1 > > lock(

Re: Linux 3.6-rc4

2012-09-07 Thread Linus Torvalds
Al? Please look into this. I'm not entirely sure what's going on, but lockdep complains about this: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0CPU1 lock(&(&p->alloc_lock)->rlock); local_irq_disab

Re: Linux 3.6-rc4

2012-09-07 Thread Sasha Levin
On 09/04/2012 05:44 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 03:10:58PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > The kernel summit is over, and most people have either returned or are > > returning from San Diego. > > Still seeing this, that I started seeing just before leaving for San Diego.. >

Re: Linux 3.6-rc4

2012-09-05 Thread Dave Jones
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 03:10:58PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > The kernel summit is over, and most people have either returned or are > returning from San Diego. Still seeing this, that I started seeing just before leaving for San Diego.. Dave ==

Linux 3.6-rc4

2012-09-01 Thread Linus Torvalds
y for empty flushes Lee Jones (2): ARM: ux500: Fix merge error, no matching driver name for 'snd_soc_u8500' ARM: ux500: Ensure probing of Audio devices when Device Tree is enabled Linus Torvalds (1): Linux 3.6-rc4 Liu Bo (2): Btrfs: fix a dio write regression