Re: linux-next stats (Was: Linux 3-10-rc1)

2013-05-12 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Mon, 2013-05-13 at 11:18 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > 47 powerpc Oops ;-) So most of that *was* in -next for at least a day or two afaik just not before the merge window opened. The reason for that is that I was on an extended vacation for 5 weeks and was playing catch up until fairly

linux-next stats (Was: Linux 3-10-rc1)

2013-05-12 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Sat, 11 May 2013 18:00:09 -0700 Linus Torvalds wrote: > > So this is the biggest -rc1 in the last several years (perhaps ever) ever (see http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html after today's linux-next release). > Which was unexpected, because while linux-next was fairly big, it > wasn't exc

Re: Linux 3-10-rc1

2013-05-11 Thread Chris Jones
On 05/12/2013 11:00 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > So this is the biggest -rc1 in the last several years (perhaps ever) > at least as far as counting commits go, even if not necessarily in > actual lines (I didn't check the statistics on that). > > Which was unexpected, because while linux-next was fa

Linux 3-10-rc1

2013-05-11 Thread Linus Torvalds
So this is the biggest -rc1 in the last several years (perhaps ever) at least as far as counting commits go, even if not necessarily in actual lines (I didn't check the statistics on that). Which was unexpected, because while linux-next was fairly big, it wasn't exceptionally so. I'm sure Stephen