On Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:56:53 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:31:46PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> >> I can easily reproduce the problem in 2.6.22-rc4. There are no
> >> sata_promise changes between rc3 and rc4, but Tejun's libata
> >> polling SETXFER
Hello,
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:31:46PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>> I can easily reproduce the problem in 2.6.22-rc4. There are no
>> sata_promise changes between rc3 and rc4, but Tejun's libata
>> polling SETXFER change was included in rc4. Reverting it makes
>> sata
Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:31:46PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
I can easily reproduce the problem in 2.6.22-rc4. There are no
sata_promise changes between rc3 and rc4, but Tejun's libata
polling SETXFER change was included in rc4. Reverting it makes
sata_promise work again
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:31:46PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> I can easily reproduce the problem in 2.6.22-rc4. There are no
> sata_promise changes between rc3 and rc4, but Tejun's libata
> polling SETXFER change was included in rc4. Reverting it makes
> sata_promise work again for me.
Ugh.
On Tue, 05 Jun 2007 17:14:46 +0100, David Greaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[Tejun, Jeff, added you since the bisect points to your patch.]
>
>Sorry, mail glitch means I lost a couple of emails...
>
>I said:
>Compile warnings and a new regression: hang on boot during sata_promise
>detection...
>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So -rc4 is out there now, hopefully shrinking the regression list further.
> I'd ask that people involved with the known regressions please test
> whether they got fixed, and if you wrote a patch and it's still pending,
> please make sure to push it upstream..
[Tejun, J
6 matches
Mail list logo
