On 4/22/05, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- linux/kernel/power/swsusp.c~2005-04-22 17:07:56.0 +0200
> +++ linux/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2005-04-22 17:09:22.0 +0200
> @@ -1239,7 +1239,7 @@ static int check_sig(void)
> */
>error =
Thank you.
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 08:20 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Freitag,
> 22. April 2005 03:20 schrieb Bob Gill:
> > OK. I downloaded, patched and started the build. Basically everything
> > stops when I get a "microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared" error
>
> Known problem. Fix i
Pavel Machek wrote:
>> 1. Is it necessary to print the following message during regular boot?
>>swsusp: Suspend partition has wrong signature?
> Hmm, feel free to provide a patch. (I need something to try git on :-).
Attached (sorry, Thunderbird...). One may argue over KERN_ERR, but i
don't m
Hi!
> > Nice, so I now have my own -git tree, with two changes in it...
> >
> > Is there way to say "git diff -r origin:" but dump it patch-by-patch
> > with some usable headers?
> >
> > [Looking at git export]
>
> Either Linus' demo git-export (NOT the same as git export!), or git
> patch. In
Al Viro wrote:
> thread_info, part 1:
Patches look fine. Some of the helper stuff could be moved to
asm-generic, but that can still be done later. The headers really need
some serious cleanup in this area, the dependencies are damned fragile.
I8 still have a completely untested patch to con
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Unfortunately first merge will make it practically unusable :-(.
No, quite the reverse. If I merge from you, and you use my commit ID as
the "base" point, it will work again.
But yes, if you actually send the result as _patches_ to me, then the
c
On Thursday 21 April 2005 02:59, you wrote:
Hello,
[build.log]
...
drivers/usb/storage/debug.c: In function `usb_stor_show_sense':
drivers/usb/storage/debug.c:166: warning: implicit declaration of function
`scsi_sense_key_string'
drivers/usb/storage/debug.c:166: warning: assignment makes pointer
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> You should put this into .git/remotes
>
> linus rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
>
Make that
rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/gi
Am Freitag, 22. April 2005 03:20 schrieb Bob Gill:
> OK. I downloaded, patched and started the build. Basically everything
> stops when I get a "microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared" error
Known problem. Fix in the pipeline.
Regards
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from th
OK. I downloaded, patched and started the build. Basically everything
stops when I get a "microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared" error
(the build keeps trying, but no modules get created).
I suspect others may have the same problem, but feel free to e-mail me
for more information (and you
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 03:33:42PM +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
> Compile error on x86_64:
>
> CC [M] drivers/usb/image/microtek.o
> drivers/usb/image/microtek.c: In function `mts_scsi_abort':
> drivers/usb/image/microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared (first use
> in this function)
Pat
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 01:22:01AM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Hi!
Hi,
> > > > You should put this into .git/remotes
> > > >
> > > > linus
> > > > rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
> >
> > (git
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Is there way to say "git diff -r origin:" but dump it patch-by-patch
> with some usable headers?
In my git version there is a command called "git-export" for exactly this.
I don't know if Pasky included that in his trees, but if not, you can just
g
Hi!
> > > You should put this into .git/remotes
> > >
> > > linus
> > > rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
>
> (git addremote is preferred for that :-)
Nice, so I now have my own -git tree, with two changes in it...
Is there way to say "git diff -r orig
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Hi!
>
> It seems that someone should write "Kernel hacker's guide to
> git"... Documentation/git.txt seems like good place. I guess I'll do
> it.
I've also started writing
Hi!
It seems that someone should write "Kernel hacker's guide to
git"... Documentation/git.txt seems like good place. I guess I'll do
it.
> > just plain vanilla" without rm -rf?
>
> git cancel will give you "plain last commit". If you need plain vanilla,
> the "hard way" now is to just do
>
>
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> Are they new or were they in -rc2, too?
Some further backtracking:
The nic problem is already present in 2.6.12-rc1.
The pcmcia hang problem is not present in 2.6.12-rc1.
--
Andreas Steinmetz SPAMmers use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from t
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>>there's some problems with swsusp in 2.6.12-rc3 (x86_64):
>
>
> Are they new or were they in -rc2, too?
>
Fixed the rc2/rc3 IDE Oops myself today that prevented me to test rc2
earlier. It seems the IDE maintainer is currently not very responsive
and I didn't ha
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 09:00:09PM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Hi!
Hi,
> > > Well, not sure.
> > >
> > > I did
> > >
> > > git track linus
> > > git cancel
> > >
> > > but Makefile still contains -rc2. (Is "git cancel" right way to
On 4/21/05, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Changes since 2.6.12-rc2:
>
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
...
> [PATCH] ppc32: Fix cpufreq problems
this depends on two patches in -mm:
add-suspend-method-to-cpufreq-core.patch
Add suspend method to cpufreq core
add-suspend-met
Hi!
> > > You should put this into .git/remotes
> > >
> > > linus
> > > rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
>
> (git addremote is preferred for that :-)
Oops :-).
> > Well, not sure.
> >
> > I did
> >
> > git track linus
> > git cancel
> >
> > but Ma
Hi!
> there's some problems with swsusp in 2.6.12-rc3 (x86_64):
Are they new or were they in -rc2, too?
> 1. Is it necessary to print the following message during regular boot?
>swsusp: Suspend partition has wrong signature?
>It is a bit annoying and I believe it will confuse some swsusp
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 06:57:23PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> thread_info part 3: heads.
headers, even...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Pl
m68k thread_info - part 4
The rest:
a) added embedded thread_info [m68k processor.h]
b) added missing symbols in asm-offsets.c
c) task_thread_info() and freinds in asm-m68k/thread_info.h
d) made m68k thread_info.h included by m68k processor.h, not the
other
thread_info part 3: heads.
a) in smp_lock.h #include of sched.h and spinlock.h moved under
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL.
b) interrupt.h now explicitly pulls sched.h (not via smp_lock.h from
hardirq.h as it used to)
c) in two more places we need changes to compensate for (a) - one place in
arc
thread_info part 2:
encapsulates the rest of arch-dependent operations with thread_info access.
Two new helpers - setup_thread_info() and end_of_stack(). For normal
case the former consists of copying thread_info of parent to new thread_info
and the latter returns pointer immediately past
thread_info, part 1:
new helper - task_thread_info(task). On platforms that have thread_info
allocated separately (i.e. in default case) it simply returns task->thread_info.
m68k wants (and for good reasons) to embed its thread_info into task_struct.
So it will (in later patch) have task_
Hi Pavel,
there's some problems with swsusp in 2.6.12-rc3 (x86_64):
1. Is it necessary to print the following message during regular boot?
swsusp: Suspend partition has wrong signature?
It is a bit annoying and I believe it will confuse some swsusp
users.
2. PCMCIA related hangs during s
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 02:03:27PM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > You should put this into .git/remotes
> >
> > linus
> > rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
(git addremote is preferred for that
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:10:15AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Jan Dittmer wrote:
> > Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Geert Uytterhoeven:
> > > [PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.11
> > > [PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.12-rc2
> >
> > Why do I still get
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:19:10 +0200 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
| > It's available both as a patch (against 2.6.11) and as a tar-ball, and
| Where IS the tarball? Not on www.kernel.org, that's for sure.
in http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this lis
The following patch fixes the Oops though I don't know if this is the
correct solution.
--- linux-2.6.12-rc3/drivers/ide/ide.c.ast
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc3/drivers/ide/ide.c
@@ -2082,7 +2082,8 @@
static int ide_drive_remove(struct device * dev)
{
ide_drive_t * drive = container_o
As already reported to lkml and IDE maintainer for 2.6.12-rc2:
Oops on 'cardctl eject' of an IDE flash disk (Pretec ATA Flash 16MB).
2.6.11.2 works fine.
System:
Linux (none) 2.6.12-rc3-gringo #1 Thu Apr 21 15:45:08 CEST 2005 x86_64
unknown unknown GNU/Linux
Kernel messages from startup to and i
Compile error on x86_64:
CC [M] drivers/usb/image/microtek.o
drivers/usb/image/microtek.c: In function `mts_scsi_abort':
drivers/usb/image/microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared (first use
in this function)
drivers/usb/image/microtek.c:338: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
reported on
> It's available both as a patch (against 2.6.11) and as a tar-ball, and
Where IS the tarball? Not on www.kernel.org, that's for sure.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrum) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame Einri
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 13:20 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > And for the crazy people, the git archive on kernel.org is up and running
> > under /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git. For the
> > adventurous of you, the name of the 2.6.12-rc3 release is a very nice and
> > read
Hi!
> > And for the crazy people, the git archive on kernel.org is up and running
> > under /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git. For the
> > adventurous of you, the name of the 2.6.12-rc3 release is a very nice and
> > readable:
> >
> > a2755a80f40e5794ddc20e00f781af9d6320fafb
Hi!
> And for the crazy people, the git archive on kernel.org is up and running
> under /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git. For the
> adventurous of you, the name of the 2.6.12-rc3 release is a very nice and
> readable:
>
> a2755a80f40e5794ddc20e00f781af9d6320fafb
>
> and
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Jan Dittmer wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Geert Uytterhoeven:
> > [PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.11
> > [PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.12-rc2
>
> Why do I still get this error when trying to cross-compile for m68k?
Because to build m68k kernels,
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven:
> [PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.11
> [PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.12-rc2
Why do I still get this error when trying to cross-compile for m68k?
toolchain:
Reading specs from
/usr/local/m68k-uclinux-tools/lib/gcc/m68k-uclinux
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> [PATCH] zfcp: convert to compat_ioctl
This does not seem to compile anymore with defconfig:
CC drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.o
/usr/src/ctest/rc/kernel/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c:63: warning:
initialization from incompatible pointer type
/usr/src/ctest/rc/kernel/
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 17:59 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> And for the crazy people, the git archive on kernel.org is up and running
> under /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git. For the
> adventurous of you, the name of the 2.6.12-rc3 release is a very nice and
> readable:
>
>
Linux 2.6.12-rc3 is still missing the following compile fixes:
[PATCH] fix ultrastor.c compile error
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=111391774018717&w=2
[PATCH] fix aic7xxx_osm.c compile failure (gcc 2.95.x only)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=1113917
Patrick McFarland wrote:
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:09 pm, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
Why is kb not used anymore? What happened?
Linus decided that keyboards are out, and voice activation is in. Remember to
use a high quality microphone!
Ohh _G_ Is that Why!? I thought it was cause t
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:09 pm, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> Why is kb not used anymore? What happened?
Linus decided that keyboards are out, and voice activation is in. Remember to
use a high quality microphone!
--
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Computer games don't aff
Have a look through the mail archives and try "Bitkeeper and Linux" in
google, lets just say its been interesting.
--
James Purser
http://ksit.dynalias.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info a
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ok,
you know what the subject line means by now, but this release is a bit
different from the usual ones, for obvious reasons. It's the first in a
_long_ time that I've done without using BK, and it's the first one ever
that has been built up completely with "git".
It's av
Ok,
you know what the subject line means by now, but this release is a bit
different from the usual ones, for obvious reasons. It's the first in a
_long_ time that I've done without using BK, and it's the first one ever
that has been built up completely with "git".
It's available both as a pa
48 matches
Mail list logo
