> We really need a collection of include files that only
> define the manifest constants and structures used for
> communication with user space. These can then be used both
> by glibc and by the kernel. This yields includes
> and and the former defines a constant API.
> It ideally never changes
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> On 29 Sep 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > By author:Andries Brouwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 03:41:41PM -0700, Jack Howarth wrote:
> > >
> > > > I find that the compi
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 04:10:51PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > > I find that the compile of gnome-utils fails as follows...
> > >
> > > In file included from /usr/include/linux/string.h:21,
> > > from /usr/include/linux/fs.h:23,
> > > from badblocks.c:43:
On 29 Sep 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> By author:Andries Brouwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 03:41:41PM -0700, Jack Howarth wrote:
> >
> > > I find that the compile of gnome-utils fails as follows...
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Andries Brouwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 03:41:41PM -0700, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> > I find that the compile of gnome-utils fails as follows...
> >
> > In file included from /usr/include/linux/
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 01:41:09AM +0200, Andries Brouwer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 03:41:41PM -0700, Jack Howarth wrote:
>
> > I find that the compile of gnome-utils fails as follows...
> >
> > In file included from /usr/include/linux/string.h:21,
> > from /usr/include
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 03:41:41PM -0700, Jack Howarth wrote:
> I find that the compile of gnome-utils fails as follows...
>
> In file included from /usr/include/linux/string.h:21,
> from /usr/include/linux/fs.h:23,
> from badblocks.c:43:
Yes, a well-known ph
Hello,
In building the RedHat 7.0 srpm for gnome-utils on linuxppc
using glibc 2.1.94 and the Linux 2.4-test9 kernel I believe
I have uncovered a flaw in the linux/fs.h header. Unless I
apply a patch like below to linux/fs.h...
--- fs.h.orgThu Sep 28 18:32:55 2000
+++ fs.hThu Sep
8 matches
Mail list logo