> "David" == David S Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 19:01:18 +0100 (BST) From: Alan Cox
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>o Acenic 0.45 fixes (Chip Salzenberg)
David> This adds a huge comment claiming to fix some race condition,
David> but no actual code is changed.
According to David S. Miller:
>o Acenic 0.45 fixes (Chip Salzenberg)
>
> This adds a huge comment claiming to fix some race condition,
> but no actual code is changed. How can this be? :-)
The bug fix was already in. The log message is misleading.
--
Chip Sa
Date:Fri, 1 Sep 2000 19:01:18 +0100 (BST)
From: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
oAcenic 0.45 fixes (Chip Salzenberg)
This adds a huge comment claiming to fix some race condition,
but no actual code is changed. How can this be? :-)
Later,
David S.
According to Albert D. Cahalan:
> The last time this issue came up, it was discovered that Windows 9x
> does not use the same generation rules as Windows NT.
Well, making the rules the same as NT would be fine, I suspect.
Even better would be a mount option, I think, since there will
always be so
Alan Cox writes:
> o Make vfat use the same generation rules as (H. Kawaguchi,
> in windows 9xChip Salzenberg)
I doubt this is obviously correct. The last time this issue
came up, it was discovered that Windows 9x does not use the
same generatio
Since 2.2.17 isnt out yet I've released 2.2.18pre2 versus 2.2.17pre20. So
you need to grab 2.2.16 then apply the 2.2.17pre20 patch then the 2.2.18pre
patch of choice.
Ok 2.2.18pre2 merges the large stuff that doesnt interfere with other parts
of the kernel and some small fixes that are needed. M
6 matches
Mail list logo
