> root=/dev/nfs ip=both ether=0,0,eth0 gives this result
>
> Dec 10 22:50:52 Eddys dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:50:ba:05:7b:fb via eth0
> Dec 10 22:50:52 Eddys dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 192.168.50.2 to 00:50:ba:05:7b:fb
> via eth0
Those are DHCP. 'both' is the old keywords for rarp and bootp. It no
> did we lose ip=autoconf. I see dhcp and arp transmitting infinitely. I was
> able to boot only after completely entering nfsroot= and ip= boot commands.
>
> 2.2.17 worked thusley.
:
I didn't try with 2.2.18 yet but looking at the source (ipconfig.c)
seem that my patch wasn't accepted, you can
did we lose ip=autoconf. I see dhcp and arp transmitting infinitely. I was
able to boot only after completely entering nfsroot= and ip= boot commands.
2.2.17 worked thusley.
root=/dev/nfs ether=0,0,eth0
2.2.18-pre26 works only
root=/dev/nfs
nfsroot=192.168.50.11:/tftpboot/191.168.50.2,rsize=81
> http://www.moses.uklinux.net/patches/dontdiff
>
> the old one contained vmlinux.lds which would is good for kdb kernels
> where vmlinux.lds is automatically generated at runtime.
vmlinux.lds for 2.2 is dynamically generated. I should probably have used your
dontdiff ;)
-
To unsubscribe from th
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> The patch I intend to be 2.2.18 is out as 2.2.18pre26 in the usual place.
> I'll move it over tomorrow if nobody reports any horrors, missing files etc
>
Will
ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/andrea/patches/v2.2/2.2.18pre25/VM-global-2.2.18p
actually, if you do have a mention of vmlinux.lds in the actual patch then
I can't see how vmlinux.lds in dontdiff could have caused it? But it
needed updating (for this very reason) anyway...
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
> my fault, my fault! Sorry, dontdiff updated on
>
> http
my fault, my fault! Sorry, dontdiff updated on
http://www.moses.uklinux.net/patches/dontdiff
the old one contained vmlinux.lds which would is good for kdb kernels
where vmlinux.lds is automatically generated at runtime.
Regards,
Tigran
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Michael Rothwell wrote:
> Alan Cox
> > The patch I intend to be 2.2.18 is out as 2.2.18pre26 in the usual place.
> > I'll move it over tomorrow if nobody reports any horrors, missing files etc
>
> Fresh 2.2.17, "patch -p1 < /pre-patch-2.2.18-26"
>
> can't find file to patch at input line 38909
> Perhaps you used the wrong -p or -
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Michael Rothwell wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > The patch I intend to be 2.2.18 is out as 2.2.18pre26 in the usual place.
> > I'll move it over tomorrow if nobody reports any horrors, missing files etc
>
>
> Fresh 2.2.17, "patch -p1 < /pre-patch-2.2.18-26"
>
> can't find
On Sat, 09 Dec 2000 18:32:56 -0500,
Michael Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Alan Cox wrote:
>> The patch I intend to be 2.2.18 is out as 2.2.18pre26 in the usual place.
>> I'll move it over tomorrow if nobody reports any horrors, missing files etc
>
>Fresh 2.2.17, "patch -p1 < /pre-patch-2.2
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 11:00:41PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> The patch I intend to be 2.2.18 is out as 2.2.18pre26 in the usual place.
> I'll move it over tomorrow if nobody reports any horrors, missing files etc
The text leading up to this was:
--
|diff -u --new-file --re
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> The patch I intend to be 2.2.18 is out as 2.2.18pre26 in the usual place.
> I'll move it over tomorrow if nobody reports any horrors, missing files etc
Fresh 2.2.17, "patch -p1 < /pre-patch-2.2.18-26"
can't find file to patch at input line 38909
Perhaps you used the wrong -
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 11:00:41PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> The patch I intend to be 2.2.18 is out as 2.2.18pre26 in the usual place.
> I'll move it over tomorrow if nobody reports any horrors, missing files etc
I haven't checked anywhere yet, but is there a changelog someplace?
--
Tom Rini (T
The patch I intend to be 2.2.18 is out as 2.2.18pre26 in the usual place.
I'll move it over tomorrow if nobody reports any horrors, missing files etc
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http
14 matches
Mail list logo