Re: Linux-tracecalls, a clarification

Carl Spalletta wrote: > +#The name of an operations structure member, wrongly interpreted by > +#cscope as the name of an actual function - it should be ignored, > +#since it has been confused by cscope with the name of some actual > +#caller. HOWEVER the callbacks are found anyway,

Linux-tracecalls, a clarification

http://www.linuxrd.com/~carl/cgi-bin/lnxtc.pl?help --- Horst von Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Re: [ANNOUNCE] Linux-tracecalls, a new tool for Kernel development, released > > If it can't find out where a function could be called through a pointer > (very common due to the OOP-in-C style in