On Nov 2, 2007, at 9:28 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Trond Myklebust wrote:
Could you please try the following patch?
Cheers
Trond
Its a new month so I'll ping again about sending this fix upstream to
linus for 2.6.24 :) ?
- k
Trond,
any update on sending this to Linus
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> Could you please try the following patch?
>
> Cheers
> Trond
Its a new month so I'll ping again about sending this fix upstream to
linus for 2.6.24 :) ?
- k
> - CUT HERE -
> From: Trond M
On Oct 26, 2007, at 4:42 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 25, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
Could you please try the following patch?
Cheers
Trond
- CUT HERE
-
From: Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 25 Oc
On Oct 25, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
Could you please try the following patch?
Cheers
Trond
- CUT HERE
-
From: Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:56:10 -0400
NFS: Fix the ustat() regress
On Oct 25, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 13:36 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 25, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
Could you please try the following patch?
this fixes my issue. Any reason this hasn't been accepted?
Do you mean apart from the
On Oct 25, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
Could you please try the following patch?
this fixes my issue. Any reason this hasn't been accepted?
- k
- CUT HERE
-
From: Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 25
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 13:36 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> On Oct 25, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
> > Could you please try the following patch?
>
> this fixes my issue. Any reason this hasn't been accepted?
Do you mean apart from the fact that I wrote it a couple of hours
ago? :-)
Could you please try the following patch?
Cheers
Trond
- CUT HERE -
From: Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:56:10 -0400
NFS: Fix the ustat() regression
Since 2.6.18, the superblock sb->s_root has been a dumm
On Oct 24, 2007, at 12:05 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Oct 23, 2007, at 8:21 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 17:52 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
I'm looking into an issue with LTP's ustat01 & ustat02 tests in
which
they report the following:
ustat01 1 FAIL : ustat(2) fail
On Oct 23, 2007, at 8:21 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 17:52 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
I'm looking into an issue with LTP's ustat01 & ustat02 tests in which
they report the following:
ustat01 1 FAIL : ustat(2) failed and setthe errno to 116 :
Stale NFS file handle
us
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 17:52 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> I'm looking into an issue with LTP's ustat01 & ustat02 tests in which
> they report the following:
>
> ustat01 1 FAIL : ustat(2) failed and setthe errno to 116 :
> Stale NFS file handle
> ustat02 2 FAIL : ustat(2) failed to
I'm looking into an issue with LTP's ustat01 & ustat02 tests in which
they report the following:
ustat01 1 FAIL : ustat(2) failed and setthe errno to 116 :
Stale NFS file handle
ustat02 2 FAIL : ustat(2) failed to produce expected error;
14, errno: EFAULT and got 116
It appe
12 matches
Mail list logo