Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT

2007-11-07 Thread Kumar Gala
On Nov 2, 2007, at 9:28 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Trond Myklebust wrote: Could you please try the following patch? Cheers Trond Its a new month so I'll ping again about sending this fix upstream to linus for 2.6.24 :) ? - k Trond, any update on sending this to Linus

Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT

2007-11-02 Thread Kumar Gala
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Trond Myklebust wrote: > Could you please try the following patch? > > Cheers > Trond Its a new month so I'll ping again about sending this fix upstream to linus for 2.6.24 :) ? - k > - CUT HERE - > From: Trond M

Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT

2007-10-29 Thread Kumar Gala
On Oct 26, 2007, at 4:42 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Oct 25, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: Could you please try the following patch? Cheers Trond - CUT HERE - From: Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 25 Oc

Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT

2007-10-26 Thread Kumar Gala
On Oct 25, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: Could you please try the following patch? Cheers Trond - CUT HERE - From: Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:56:10 -0400 NFS: Fix the ustat() regress

Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT

2007-10-25 Thread Kumar Gala
On Oct 25, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 13:36 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: On Oct 25, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: Could you please try the following patch? this fixes my issue. Any reason this hasn't been accepted? Do you mean apart from the

Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT

2007-10-25 Thread Kumar Gala
On Oct 25, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: Could you please try the following patch? this fixes my issue. Any reason this hasn't been accepted? - k - CUT HERE - From: Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 25

Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT

2007-10-25 Thread Trond Myklebust
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 13:36 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > On Oct 25, 2007, at 12:59 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > > Could you please try the following patch? > > this fixes my issue. Any reason this hasn't been accepted? Do you mean apart from the fact that I wrote it a couple of hours ago? :-)

Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT

2007-10-25 Thread Trond Myklebust
Could you please try the following patch? Cheers Trond - CUT HERE - From: Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:56:10 -0400 NFS: Fix the ustat() regression Since 2.6.18, the superblock sb->s_root has been a dumm

Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT

2007-10-25 Thread Kumar Gala
On Oct 24, 2007, at 12:05 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: On Oct 23, 2007, at 8:21 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 17:52 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: I'm looking into an issue with LTP's ustat01 & ustat02 tests in which they report the following: ustat01 1 FAIL : ustat(2) fail

Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT

2007-10-23 Thread Kumar Gala
On Oct 23, 2007, at 8:21 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 17:52 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: I'm looking into an issue with LTP's ustat01 & ustat02 tests in which they report the following: ustat01 1 FAIL : ustat(2) failed and setthe errno to 116 : Stale NFS file handle us

Re: LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT

2007-10-23 Thread Trond Myklebust
On Tue, 2007-10-23 at 17:52 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: > I'm looking into an issue with LTP's ustat01 & ustat02 tests in which > they report the following: > > ustat01 1 FAIL : ustat(2) failed and setthe errno to 116 : > Stale NFS file handle > ustat02 2 FAIL : ustat(2) failed to

LTP ustat01 test fails on NFSROOT

2007-10-23 Thread Kumar Gala
I'm looking into an issue with LTP's ustat01 & ustat02 tests in which they report the following: ustat01 1 FAIL : ustat(2) failed and setthe errno to 116 : Stale NFS file handle ustat02 2 FAIL : ustat(2) failed to produce expected error; 14, errno: EFAULT and got 116 It appe