Re: [LTP] Re: [Dev] Re: Kernel Panic with LTP on 2.6.11-rc1 (was Re: LTP Results for 2.6.x and 2.4.x)

2005-01-21 Thread Chris Wright
* Bryce Harrington ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Well, I'm not having much luck. strace isn't installed on the system > (and is giving errors when trying to compile it). Also, the ssh session > (and sshd) quits whenever I try running the following growfiles command > manually, so I'm having troubl

Re: [LTP] Re: [Dev] Re: Kernel Panic with LTP on 2.6.11-rc1 (was Re: LTP Results for 2.6.x and 2.4.x)

2005-01-21 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Bryce Harrington wrote: > On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Chris Wright wrote: > > * Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Bryce Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am unable to find the oops trace amongst all that stuff. Help? > > > > > > (It would have been handy to i

Re: [Dev] Re: Kernel Panic with LTP on 2.6.11-rc1 (was Re: LTP Results for 2.6.x and 2.4.x)

2005-01-21 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Chris Wright wrote: > * Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Bryce Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am unable to find the oops trace amongst all that stuff. Help? > > > > (It would have been handy to include it in the bug report, actually) > > Yes, it would.

Re: Kernel Panic with LTP on 2.6.11-rc1 (was Re: LTP Results for 2.6.x and 2.4.x)

2005-01-21 Thread William Lee Irwin III
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 03:35:20PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > I am unable to find the oops trace amongst all that stuff. Help? > (It would have been handy to include it in the bug report, actually) There was no oops. The panic() in oom_kill.c was triggered. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this

Re: [Dev] Re: Kernel Panic with LTP on 2.6.11-rc1 (was Re: LTP Results for 2.6.x and 2.4.x)

2005-01-21 Thread Chris Wright
* Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Bryce Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am unable to find the oops trace amongst all that stuff. Help? > > (It would have been handy to include it in the bug report, actually) Yes, it would. Or at least some better granularity leading up to t

Re: Kernel Panic with LTP on 2.6.11-rc1 (was Re: LTP Results for 2.6.x and 2.4.x)

2005-01-21 Thread Andrew Morton
Bryce Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > cmdline="mkfifo gffifo18; growfiles -b -W gf13 -e 1 -u -i 0 -L 30 -I r > -r 1-4096 gffifo18" > contacts="" > analysis=exit > initiation_status="ok" > <<>> > growfiles(gf13): 17094 DEBUG1 Using random seed of 1106350453 > Kernel panic - not syncing: Ou

Kernel Panic with LTP on 2.6.11-rc1 (was Re: LTP Results for 2.6.x and 2.4.x)

2005-01-21 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Bryce Harrington wrote: > Here's an updated summary of our LTP regression test runs against the > 2.6.x and 2.4.x kernels on RedHat 9.0: > > http://developer.osdl.org/bryce/ltp/ > > I've run into some issues with patch-2.6.11-rc1 and the latest LTP, but > will post numbers

LTP Results for 2.6.x and 2.4.x

2005-01-18 Thread Bryce Harrington
Here's an updated summary of our LTP regression test runs against the 2.6.x and 2.4.x kernels on RedHat 9.0: http://developer.osdl.org/bryce/ltp/ Briefly, here are the numbers for the most recent kernels: Patch Name TestReq# LTP Ver CPUPASS FAIL WARN BROK --