* Zilvinas Valinskas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Ingo,
>
> I think I've found a solution for a problem. Is this sane thing to do
> ? At least lockdep is happy now, does not complain anymore. It seems
> that ->pi_lock was not register with lockdep correctly (something
> about classes ..
Hello Ingo,
I think I've found a solution for a problem. Is this sane thing to do ?
At least lockdep is happy now, does not complain anymore. It seems that
->pi_lock was not register with lockdep correctly (something about
classes ... 8).
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index d154cc7.
Hello lkml,
Booting ixp4xx/ARM/BE with lockdep enabled to test my code, I got a
lockdep warning (see below). Does it mean that soft-lockup detector is
started too early ? Any advice how to approach and fix the problem are
appreciated very much. If CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP=n, lockdep does not
co
3 matches
Mail list logo