On 01/11/2008 06:21 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>> On 01/11/2008 04:35 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>> Chuck Ebbert wrote:
commit 607126c2a21cd6e9bb807fdd415c1a992f7b9009 changed command
validation
to allow short commands in 16-byte CDBs, but it also made checking more
>>
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 01/11/2008 04:35 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
commit 607126c2a21cd6e9bb807fdd415c1a992f7b9009 changed command
validation
to allow short commands in 16-byte CDBs, but it also made checking more
strict. Before the change, a 10-byte SG_IO command could have its
On 01/11/2008 04:35 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>> commit 607126c2a21cd6e9bb807fdd415c1a992f7b9009 changed command
>> validation
>> to allow short commands in 16-byte CDBs, but it also made checking more
>> strict. Before the change, a 10-byte SG_IO command could have its
>> length
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
commit 607126c2a21cd6e9bb807fdd415c1a992f7b9009 changed command validation
to allow short commands in 16-byte CDBs, but it also made checking more
strict. Before the change, a 10-byte SG_IO command could have its length set
to 9 and still work. Now it fails. Not sure if this i
commit 607126c2a21cd6e9bb807fdd415c1a992f7b9009 changed command validation
to allow short commands in 16-byte CDBs, but it also made checking more
strict. Before the change, a 10-byte SG_IO command could have its length set
to 9 and still work. Now it fails. Not sure if this is a bug, but it has
ca
5 matches
Mail list logo
