On Sat, 29 Aug 2020, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Just adding Christoph to the participants list, since at a guess it's
> > due to his changes whether they came from the nvme side or the dma
> > side..
> >
> > Christoph?
>
> This kinda looks like the sqsize regression we had in earlier 5.9-rc,
>
On 29.08.20 20:40, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 11:36 AM Gabriel C wrote:
This kinda looks like the sqsize regression we had in earlier 5.9-rc,
but that should have been fixed in -rc2 with
git tag --contains 7442ddcedc344b6fa073692f165dffdd1889e780
returns nothing, that com
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 11:36 AM Gabriel C wrote:
>
> > This kinda looks like the sqsize regression we had in earlier 5.9-rc,
> > but that should have been fixed in -rc2 with
>
> git tag --contains 7442ddcedc344b6fa073692f165dffdd1889e780
> returns nothing, that commit only exits in master, so pro
Am Sa., 29. Aug. 2020 um 19:57 Uhr schrieb Christoph Hellwig :
>
> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 10:54:47AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Just adding Christoph to the participants list, since at a guess it's
> > due to his changes whether they came from the nvme side or the dma
> > side..
> >
> > Chri
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 10:54:47AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Just adding Christoph to the participants list, since at a guess it's
> due to his changes whether they came from the nvme side or the dma
> side..
>
> Christoph?
This kinda looks like the sqsize regression we had in earlier 5.9-rc
Just adding Christoph to the participants list, since at a guess it's
due to his changes whether they came from the nvme side or the dma
side..
Christoph?
Linus
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 10:06 AM Daniel Exner wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> (please keep me in the loop, as I'm currently not s
Hi,
(please keep me in the loop, as I'm currently not suscribed)
both 5.9-rc1 and -rc2 fail to boot with my TOSHIBA-RD400 NVME:
[1.015590] [ cut here ]
[1.015594] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 99 at mm/page_alloc.c:4864
__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x299/0x330
[1.015594] M
7 matches
Mail list logo