Re: [PATCH v2] mux: remove the Kconfig question for the subsystem

2017-07-04 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 1:22 AM, Peter Rosin wrote: > The MULTIPLEXER question in the Kconfig might be confusing and is > of dubious value. Remove it. This makes consumers responsible for > selecting MULTIPLEXER, which they already do. Yes, this looks good to me. Still no actual *testing*, but th

Re: [PATCH v2] mux: remove the Kconfig question for the subsystem

2017-07-04 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 10:22:44AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote: > The MULTIPLEXER question in the Kconfig might be confusing and is > of dubious value. Remove it. This makes consumers responsible for > selecting MULTIPLEXER, which they already do. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin > --- > drivers/mux/

[PATCH v2] mux: remove the Kconfig question for the subsystem

2017-07-04 Thread Peter Rosin
The MULTIPLEXER question in the Kconfig might be confusing and is of dubious value. Remove it. This makes consumers responsible for selecting MULTIPLEXER, which they already do. Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin --- drivers/mux/Kconfig | 19 +-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 delet

[PATCH] mux: remove the Kconfig question for the subsystem

2017-07-03 Thread Peter Rosin
The MULTIPLEXER question in the Kconfig might be confusing and is of dubious value. Remove it. This makes consumers responsible for selecting MULTIPLEXER, which they already do. Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin --- drivers/mux/Kconfig | 15 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions

Kconfig question

2015-09-02 Thread ANDY KENNEDY
Please CC me as I'm not on LKML. Consider the following Kconfig snippet: choice prompt "Partition 1" default STORAGE_P1_u_Boot config STORAGE_P1_u_Boot bool "u-Boot" depends on ! (STORAGE_P2_u_Boot||STORAGE_P3_u_Boot) help

Re: [PATCH 1/8] FMC: create drivers/fmc and toplevel Kconfig question

2013-06-17 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 01:24:35AM +0200, Alessandro Rubini wrote: > > Nice job :) > > thanks! > > > Want me to take this through my char/misc git tree to get to Linus for > > 3.11? > > Would be great. As for the license issue, shall I send the two patches alone > or the whole set? Just redo t

Re: [PATCH 1/8] FMC: create drivers/fmc and toplevel Kconfig question

2013-06-17 Thread Alessandro Rubini
> Nice job :) thanks! > Want me to take this through my char/misc git tree to get to Linus for > 3.11? Would be great. As for the license issue, shall I send the two patches alone or the whole set? thanks /alessandro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in

Re: [PATCH 1/8] FMC: create drivers/fmc and toplevel Kconfig question

2013-06-17 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 09:13:25AM +0200, Alessandro Rubini wrote: > This commit creates the drivers/fmc directory and puts the necessary > hooks for kbuild and kconfig. The code is currently a placeholder > that only registers an empty bus. > > Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini > Acked-by: Juan

[PATCH 1/8] FMC: create drivers/fmc and toplevel Kconfig question

2013-06-12 Thread Alessandro Rubini
This commit creates the drivers/fmc directory and puts the necessary hooks for kbuild and kconfig. The code is currently a placeholder that only registers an empty bus. Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini Acked-by: Juan David Gonzalez Cobas Acked-by: Emilio G. Cota Acked-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsa

[PATCH 1/8] FMC: create drivers/fmc and toplevel Kconfig question

2013-02-21 Thread Alessandro Rubini
This commit creates the drivers/fmc directory and puts the necessary hooks for kbuild and kconfig. The code is currently a placeholder that only registers an empty bus. Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini Acked-by: Juan David Gonzalez Cobas Acked-by: Emilio G. Cota Acked-by: Samuel Iglesias Gonsa