On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 10:22 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 7 May 2015 22:17:48 +0200
> Ronny Meeus wrote:
>
>> > View on what?
>>
>> Whether the real-time priority threads are used a lot.
>> I have the impression that there are severe issues in the Linux eco
>> system (Kernel+glibc) when it
On Thu, 7 May 2015 22:17:48 +0200
Ronny Meeus wrote:
> > View on what?
>
> Whether the real-time priority threads are used a lot.
> I have the impression that there are severe issues in the Linux eco
> system (Kernel+glibc) when it comes to real-time priority handling.
>
It matters what you wa
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:23 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 6 May 2015 05:14:18 +0200
> Ronny Meeus wrote:
>
>> Thanks for looking into this.
>>
>> It looks to me that real-time priority threads are not used in many
>> systems because we discovered already several issues, both in the
>> kerne
On Wed, 6 May 2015 05:14:18 +0200
Ronny Meeus wrote:
> Thanks for looking into this.
>
> It looks to me that real-time priority threads are not used in many
> systems because we discovered already several issues, both in the
> kernel and glibc while we are using Linux only recently.
> Do you hav
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 19:05:02 +0200
> Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
>> LKML is a very high volume list, if you're seeing problems that were
>> introduced by a particular patch, it's a good idea to CC the author of
>> that patch.
>>
>> /me adds CC,
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 10:23:10 -0700
Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 19:05 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > LKML is a very high volume list, if you're seeing problems that were
> > introduced by a particular patch, it's a good idea to CC the author of
> > that patch.
>
> Adding tglx
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015 19:05:02 +0200
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> LKML is a very high volume list, if you're seeing problems that were
> introduced by a particular patch, it's a good idea to CC the author of
> that patch.
>
> /me adds CC, and tags (again) to take a peek.
Thanks Mike, although I'm not
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 10:23 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 19:05 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > LKML is a very high volume list, if you're seeing problems that were
> > introduced by a particular patch, it's a good idea to CC the author of
> > that patch.
>
> Adding tglx a
On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 19:05 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> LKML is a very high volume list, if you're seeing problems that were
> introduced by a particular patch, it's a good idea to CC the author of
> that patch.
Adding tglx as well, who's the actual author.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: se
LKML is a very high volume list, if you're seeing problems that were
introduced by a particular patch, it's a good idea to CC the author of
that patch.
/me adds CC, and tags (again) to take a peek.
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 21:10 +0100, Ronny Meeus wrote:
> I'm using a patched kernel I get from Monta
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Ronny Meeus wrote:
> I'm using a patched kernel I get from Monta-Vista, it is based on the
> 3.10 kernel with some RT patches.
> We ported an application from pSOS RTOS to Linux using the
> Xenomai-Mercury (=library to map pSOS task to POSIX threads).
>
> One of th
I'm using a patched kernel I get from Monta-Vista, it is based on the
3.10 kernel with some RT patches.
We ported an application from pSOS RTOS to Linux using the
Xenomai-Mercury (=library to map pSOS task to POSIX threads).
One of the patches applied to our kernel is:
"[PATCH RT 3/4] sched: Consi
12 matches
Mail list logo
