On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> Well, here is a patch on top of -ac5 (which already includes the first
> zoned based approach patch).
Looks ok.
I'd like to see what the patch looks on top of a virgin tree, as it should
now be noticeably smaller (no need to pas extra parameters e
On Thursday 19 July 2001 01:42, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> Yes. The inactive shortage needs to be a function of the length of
> the inactive_dirty queue rather than just the amount that free pages
> is less than some fixed minimum.
Oops, it already is, good :-]
> The target length of the
> inacti
2 matches
Mail list logo
