On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 09:54:34PM -0500, David L. Nicol wrote:
> why not port one of the twenty or thirty preexisting tools
> that let you mount a filesystem from an encrypted file instead
> of making a generic layer? That way you could have inter-os
> portability. The steganographic ones make
Dale Amon wrote:
>
> Talk about syncronicity... I had just last week asked
> about the pro's and con's on this on the crypto list and
> have heard nothing at all back. So I'll drop the body
> of that message in here:
why not port one of the twenty or thirty preexisting tools
that let you mount
Talk about syncronicity... I had just last week asked
about the pro's and con's on this on the crypto list and
have heard nothing at all back. So I'll drop the body
of that message in here:
--
I've got a crypto loopback running directly on a /dev/md0
partition and then the file system on top of t
On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 09:21:44PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Tamas Nagy") writes:
> > > Idea:
> > > extend the current file-system with an optional plug-in system, which allows
> > > for file-system level encryption instead of file
On Saturday 21 April 2001 20:52, Tamas Nagy wrote:
> extend the current file-system with an optional plug-in system, which
> allows for file-system level encryption instead of file-level. This could
> be used transparently for applications or even for file-system drivers.
> This doesn't mean an e
On Sat, Apr 21, 2001 at 09:21:44PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Tamas Nagy") writes:
>
> > Idea:
> > extend the current file-system with an optional plug-in system, which allows
> > for file-system level encryption instead of file-level.
>
> That's is one of the things the l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Tamas Nagy") writes:
> Idea:
> extend the current file-system with an optional plug-in system, which allows
> for file-system level encryption instead of file-level.
That's is one of the things the loop device offers. For better
encryption than XOR you need the patches from k
On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Tamas Nagy wrote:
> extend the current file-system with an optional plug-in system, which allows
> for file-system level encryption instead of file-level. This could be used
> transparently for applications or even for file-system drivers. This
> doesn't mean an encrypted f
>
> Hello,
ftp://www.kerneli.org/pub/linux/kerneli/
For idea encryption, you just use
losetup -e idea /dev/loop0 /filesystem
Password: whatever
mke2fs /dev/loop0
mount /dev/loop0
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTE
Have you tried:
man losetup
losetup /dev/loop0 /dev/hdxx -e DES
mke2fs /dev/loop0
mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/
On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Tamas Nagy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Lot of people would like to know their data in secure place, and the
> frequent usage of compression softwares could be time-consuming
Hello,
Lot of people would like to know their data in secure place, and the
frequent usage of compression softwares could be time-consuming and boring
sometime.
Idea:
extend the current file-system with an optional plug-in system, which allows
for file-system level encryption instead of file-lev
11 matches
Mail list logo
