In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> net/network.o: In function `init_or_cleanup':
> net/network.o(.text+0x4a530): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_PC24 ip_nat_
cleanup
My bad: Russell, you're absolutely right.
Obvious fix below.
Thanks!
Rusty.
diff -urN -I \$.*\$ -X /tmp/kerndiff.guo
Russell King writes:
> >From x86 vmlinux.lds:
>
> /* Sections to be discarded */
> /DISCARD/ : {
> *(.text.exit)
> *(.data.exit)
> *(.exitcall.exit)
> }
Thanks, this is the part I didn't catch. If you had said this in
the first email, I would have un
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 02:07:53PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> Why would ip_nat_cleanup() be removed by the linker?
Because we explicitly tell the linker to drop all code marked as
__exit:
#define __exit __attribute__ ((unused, __section__(".text.exit")))
>From x86 vmlinux.lds:
Russell King writes:
> ip_nat_standalone.c:
>
> static int init_or_cleanup(int init)
> {
> ...
> cleanup_nat:
> ip_nat_cleanup();
> ...
> }
Call ip_nat_cleanup();
> ip_nat_core:
>
> void __exit ip_nat_cleanup(void)
> {
> ip_ct_selective_cleanup(&clean_nat, NULL)
net/network.o: In function `init_or_cleanup':
net/network.o(.text+0x4a530): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_PC24 ip_nat_cleanup
says it all.
ip_nat_standalone.c:
static int init_or_cleanup(int init)
{
...
cleanup_nat:
ip_nat_cleanup();
...
}
ip_nat_core:
void __exit ip_nat_cleanup
5 matches
Mail list logo
