On Thu, 5 Oct 2000, Eric Lowe wrote:
> Agreed. I ran into the same problem myself, but I figured you probably
> didn't break it. Would be nice to see it fixed though, I'm trying
> to help debug the new VM on that machine that just so happens to use
> that chipset, and it's hard to do that when
Hello,
> I did not change it and I have yet to get a good reason from the person
> who did. I have explained why it was wrong to change, but I guess things
> will have to start crashing again when Linus accepts changes that I never
> looked at or discussed.
>
> Take it up with ManDrake Linux fo
I did not change it and I have yet to get a good reason from the person
who did. I have explained why it was wrong to change, but I guess things
will have to start crashing again when Linus accepts changes that I never
looked at or discussed.
Take it up with ManDrake Linux folks, it was there p
Hi,
the following change from t9p7->t9p8 in ide-pci.c
- if ((dev->class & ~(0xfa)) != ((PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_IDE << 8) | 5)) {
+ if ((dev->class & ~(0xff)) != (PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_IDE << 8)) {
causes a lot of trouble to me. Seems to be the same thing, which has
already been reported to l-k, but
4 matches
Mail list logo
