On Wed, Oct 24 2007, John Stoffel wrote:
> > "Jens" == Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jens> On Tue, Oct 23 2007, John Stoffel wrote:
> >> > "Jens" == Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> Jens> On Tue, Oct 23 2007, David Miller wrote:
> >> >> From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL P
> "Jens" == Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jens> On Tue, Oct 23 2007, John Stoffel wrote:
>> > "Jens" == Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Jens> On Tue, Oct 23 2007, David Miller wrote:
>> >> From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:23:59 +0200
On Tue, Oct 23 2007, John Stoffel wrote:
> > "Jens" == Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jens> On Tue, Oct 23 2007, David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:23:59 +0200
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Oct 23 2007, David Miller wrote:
> >> > > F
On Tue, Oct 23 2007, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:57:11 +0200
>
> > On Tue, Oct 23 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > BTW, we avoid calling sg_init_table() for every I/O request due to Jens'
> > > trick. And Jens will remove the code to cle
From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:57:11 +0200
> On Tue, Oct 23 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > BTW, we avoid calling sg_init_table() for every I/O request due to Jens'
> > trick. And Jens will remove the code to clear sg_dma_len/addr in
> > blk_rq_map_sg(). So sparc64
> "Jens" == Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jens> On Tue, Oct 23 2007, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:23:59 +0200
>>
>> > On Tue, Oct 23 2007, David Miller wrote:
>> > > From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> > > Date: Tue, 23
On Tue, Oct 23 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:58:11 +0200
> Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 23 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 23 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 00:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
> > > > David Miller <[EMAIL PROT
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:58:11 +0200
Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 00:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
> > > David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PRO
On Tue, Oct 23 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 00:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
> > David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:23:59 +0200
> > >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 23 200
On Tue, Oct 23 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 00:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:23:59 +0200
> >
> > > On Tue, Oct 23 2007, David Miller wrote:
> > > > From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 00:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:23:59 +0200
>
> > On Tue, Oct 23 2007, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:09:33 +0200
> >
On Tue, Oct 23 2007, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:23:59 +0200
>
> > On Tue, Oct 23 2007, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:09:33 +0200
> > >
> > > > Eh this wont work, it's the w
From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:23:59 +0200
> On Tue, Oct 23 2007, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:09:33 +0200
> >
> > > Eh this wont work, it's the wrong entry... Here's a temporary
> > > work-around.
> > >
On Tue, Oct 23 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:09:33 +0200
> Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 23 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 22 2007, David Miller wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm debugging a blk_rq_map_sg() crash that i'm getting on sparc64 as
On Tue, Oct 23 2007, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:09:33 +0200
>
> > Eh this wont work, it's the wrong entry... Here's a temporary
> > work-around.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> > index c89f0d3..108202b
From: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:09:33 +0200
> Eh this wont work, it's the wrong entry... Here's a temporary
> work-around.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c b/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> index c89f0d3..108202b 100644
> --- a/drivers/ide/ide-io.c
> +++ b/drivers/ide/i
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007 09:09:33 +0200
Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 22 2007, David Miller wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm debugging a blk_rq_map_sg() crash that i'm getting on sparc64 as
> > > root is mounted over IDE. I think I know what is h
On Tue, Oct 23 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22 2007, David Miller wrote:
> >
> > I'm debugging a blk_rq_map_sg() crash that i'm getting on sparc64 as
> > root is mounted over IDE. I think I know what is happening now.
> >
> > The IDE sg table is allocated and initialized like this in
>
On Mon, Oct 22 2007, David Miller wrote:
>
> I'm debugging a blk_rq_map_sg() crash that i'm getting on sparc64 as
> root is mounted over IDE. I think I know what is happening now.
>
> The IDE sg table is allocated and initialized like this in
> drivers/ide/ide-probe.c:
>
> x = kmalloc(siz
I'm debugging a blk_rq_map_sg() crash that i'm getting on sparc64 as
root is mounted over IDE. I think I know what is happening now.
The IDE sg table is allocated and initialized like this in
drivers/ide/ide-probe.c:
x = kmalloc(sizeof(struct scatterlist) * nents, GFP_XXX);
sg_i
20 matches
Mail list logo
