On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 08:45:03PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >[] mark_held_locks+0x7e/0x130
> >[] lockdep_trace_alloc+0x63/0xc0
> >[] kmem_cache_alloc+0x35/0xe0
> >[] vm_map_ram+0x271/0x770
> >[] _
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:53 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 07:50:06AM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> So, both lockdep thingy's are the same:
I suspected this, but as the reports where slightly different I
attached bith of them, as I couldn't decide witch one was the
better/si
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 07:50:06AM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 04:29:22PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Torsten Kaiser
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Tor
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:51 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 04:29:22PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Torsten Kaiser
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Torsten Kaiser
>> > wrote:
>> >> I will keep LOCKDEP enabled on that system,
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 04:29:22PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Torsten Kaiser
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Torsten Kaiser
> > wrote:
> >> I will keep LOCKDEP enabled on that system, and if there really is
> >> another splat, I will report back
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Torsten Kaiser
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Torsten Kaiser
> wrote:
>> I will keep LOCKDEP enabled on that system, and if there really is
>> another splat, I will report back here. But I rather doubt that this
>> will be needed.
>
> After the patch,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Torsten Kaiser
wrote:
> I will keep LOCKDEP enabled on that system, and if there really is
> another splat, I will report back here. But I rather doubt that this
> will be needed.
After the patch, I did not see this problem again, but today I found
another LOCKDEP
On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 04:30:10PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 09:26:13AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 09:03:15PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > > After experiencing a hang of all IO yesterday (
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m
Hi Dave,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 09:26:13AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 09:03:15PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > After experiencing a hang of all IO yesterday (
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135142236520624&w=2 ), I turned on
> > LOCKDEP after upgrading to -rc3
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 09:37:06PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
For some reason I only managed to get the two mails from Torsten into my
xfs list folder, but the one from Dave is missing. I did see Dave's
mail in my linux-mm folder, though.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 09:03:15PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
>> After experiencing a hang of all IO yesterday (
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135142236520624&w=2 ), I turned on
>> LOCKDEP after upgrading to -rc3.
>>
>> I then tried
[add the linux-mm cc I forgot to add before sending]
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 09:26:13AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 09:03:15PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> > After experiencing a hang of all IO yesterday (
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135142236520624&w=2 ), I t
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 09:03:15PM +0100, Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> After experiencing a hang of all IO yesterday (
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135142236520624&w=2 ), I turned on
> LOCKDEP after upgrading to -rc3.
>
> I then tried to replicate the load that hung yesterday and got the
> foll
After experiencing a hang of all IO yesterday (
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135142236520624&w=2 ), I turned on
LOCKDEP after upgrading to -rc3.
I then tried to replicate the load that hung yesterday and got the
following lockdep report, implicating XFS instead of by stacking swap
onto dm-cr
14 matches
Mail list logo