On 03/11/2016 04:13 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:33:17AM -0800, Jun Wang wrote:
Guenter,
Which additional netlink changes from 4.2 did you patch? We still see
the problem with your test program with 4.1.12 which have the
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:50 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:33:17AM -0800, Jun Wang wrote:
>> Guenter,
>>
>> Which additional netlink changes from 4.2 did you patch? We still see
>> the problem with your test program with 4.1.12 which have the
>> following two patches mentio
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 11:33:17AM -0800, Jun Wang wrote:
> > On 09/25/2015 08:55 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:34:10PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Any idea what may be needed for 4.1 ?
> >>> I am currently trying https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/473041/,
> >>
> On 09/25/2015 08:55 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:34:10PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>
>>> Any idea what may be needed for 4.1 ?
>>> I am currently trying https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/473041/,
>>
>> This patch should not make any difference on 4.1 and later because
On 10/05/2015 04:26 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
On Sep 25, 2015, at 7:58 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 09/25/2015 02:37 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
Thank you for the patches to try, I'll build a kernel with them early next week
and report back. It sounds like it may not match my problem e
On Sep 25, 2015, at 7:58 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 09/25/2015 02:37 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thank you for the patches to try, I'll build a kernel with them early next
>> week
>> and report back. It sounds like it may not match my problem exactly so we'll
>> see.
>>
>
> Fo
Herbert,
On 09/25/2015 08:55 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:34:10PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Any idea what may be needed for 4.1 ?
I am currently trying https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/473041/,
This patch should not make any difference on 4.1 and later because
4.1 is
On 09/25/2015 02:37 PM, Steven Schlansker wrote:
On Sep 24, 2015, at 10:34 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Herbert,
On 09/24/2015 09:58 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 09:36:53PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/363085
might explain your pr
On Sep 25, 2015, at 2:37 PM, Steven Schlansker
wrote:
>
> On Sep 24, 2015, at 10:34 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
>> Herbert,
>>
>> On 09/24/2015 09:58 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 09:36:53PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.netw
On Sep 24, 2015, at 10:34 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Herbert,
>
> On 09/24/2015 09:58 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 09:36:53PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>
>>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/363085
>>>
>>> might explain your problem.
>>>
>>> I thought thi
On 09/25/2015 08:55 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:34:10PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Any idea what may be needed for 4.1 ?
I am currently trying https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/473041/,
This patch should not make any difference on 4.1 and later because
4.1 is where I re
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:34:10PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> Any idea what may be needed for 4.1 ?
> I am currently trying https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/473041/,
This patch should not make any difference on 4.1 and later because
4.1 is where I rewrote rhashtable resizing and it should w
Herbert,
On 09/24/2015 09:58 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 09:36:53PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/363085
might explain your problem.
I thought this was resolved in 4.1, but it looks like the problem still persists
there. At least
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 09:36:53PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/363085
>
> might explain your problem.
>
> I thought this was resolved in 4.1, but it looks like the problem still
> persists
> there. At least I have reports from my workplace that 4
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 05:29:34PM -0700, Steven Schlansker wrote:
> Hello linux-kernel,
>
> I write to you on behalf of many developers at my company, who
> are having trouble with their applications endlessly locking up
> inside of libc code, with no hope of recovery.
>
> Currently it affects o
Hello linux-kernel,
I write to you on behalf of many developers at my company, who
are having trouble with their applications endlessly locking up
inside of libc code, with no hope of recovery.
Currently it affects our Mono and Node processes mostly, and the
symptoms are the same: user code invo
16 matches
Mail list logo
