On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 11:50:23PM +, Richard Purdie wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 13:23 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:32:02PM +, James Simmons wrote:
> > > I CC Greg to explain. The backlight class didn't go away. The way it is
> > > handled is differ
Hi Greg,
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 13:23 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:32:02PM +, James Simmons wrote:
> > I CC Greg to explain. The backlight class didn't go away. The way it is
> > handled is different.
>
> Have a pointer to the patch so I can help explain better?
You've
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 09:54:21PM +, James Simmons wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:32:02PM +, James Simmons wrote:
> > > On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 15:28 +, James Simmons wrote:
> > > > > I have some patches that move the bac
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:32:02PM +, James Simmons wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Richard Purdie wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 15:28 +, James Simmons wrote:
> > > > I have some patches that move the backlight away from using the class
> > > > stuff. The only problem is the pa
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 06:32:02PM +, James Simmons wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Richard Purdie wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 15:28 +, James Simmons wrote:
> > > I have some patches that move the backlight away from using the class
> > > stuff. The only problem is the patch requires
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 18:32 +, James Simmons wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Richard Purdie wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 15:28 +, James Simmons wrote:
> > > I have some patches that move the backlight away from using the class
> > > stuff. The only problem is the patch requires all bac
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 15:28 +, James Simmons wrote:
> > I have some patches that move the backlight away from using the class
> > stuff. The only problem is the patch requires all backlight devices
> > to be linked to a real struct device. Right no
On Thu, 2007-02-08 at 15:28 +, James Simmons wrote:
> I have some patches that move the backlight away from using the class
> stuff. The only problem is the patch requires all backlight devices
> to be linked to a real struct device. Right now the acpi backligths are
> not.
Why would you wa
I have some patches that move the backlight away from using the class
stuff. The only problem is the patch requires all backlight devices
to be linked to a real struct device. Right now the acpi backligths are
not.
Signed-Off: James Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/drivers/video/backl
On Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:30:26 + Richard Purdie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm thinking of more officially volunteering to maintain the Linux
> backlight class/subsystem and have been trying to sort out the various
> pending patches. I've made a backlight tree available as:
>
> http://git.o-h
I'm thinking of more officially volunteering to maintain the Linux
backlight class/subsystem and have been trying to sort out the various
pending patches. I've made a backlight tree available as:
http://git.o-hand.com/?p=linux-rpurdie-backlight;a=shortlog;h=for-mm
(or git://git.o-hand.com/linux-r
11 matches
Mail list logo
