On Jun 19, 2007, at 19:37:51, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
I'm just not going to let this go. Stable is synonymous with, well
ummm, "stable." That means that I don't have 3000 changes a month,
it's secure and the unexpected doesn't happen. It means I can
write a lecture explaining how git work
Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
The other choice that we developers usually make is to run either testing
or unstable. "stable" is a synonym for obsolete ;-).
I'm just not going to let this go. Stable is synonymous with, well
ummm, "stable." Tha
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> it already is. But Debian Etch is stable which means there will no newer
> version of git in Debian Etch. Currently it is 1.4.whatever. When the
> next stable release is released, which takes some time with Debian,
> there will be a newer version of g
Hallo,
> Is there some way you can feed that into Debian please? Why the go
> around through a separate repository? The maintainer of git-core is
> not actively maintaining the package?
it already is. But Debian Etch is stable which means there will no newer
version of git in Debian Etch. Current
> Is there some way you can feed that into Debian please? Why the go around
> through a separate repository? The maintainer of git-core is not actively
> maintaining the package?
No. The current version of git in Debian is 1.5.2.1, a little out of
date from the current 1.5.2.2 but not too ba
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> Hello,
> a friend of mine always builds the Debian Packages from unstable for
> Debian Etch. I have on all my machines the following line in
> /etc/apt/sources.list:
>
> deb http://rmdir.de/~michael/git/ ./
>
> apt-get update; apt-get dist-u
Hello,
> after having a peek at git-core_1.5.2.1-1.dsc, and then it did build
> just fine immediately.
good point, that makes sense. I have to keep that in mind. Last time I
looked at the failed tests, saw the missing dependency and tried again.
:-)
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe from this list
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:56:10PM +0200, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> true. But when you run sid you get a newer version of git automatically.
> Sooner or later. And you can always build it yourself. It's a pain in
> the ass until you have all build dependencies installed and all the
> tests pass.
O
Hello,
* Thomas Glanzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070618 23:56]:
> > It seems that this is only for etch (and sarge). I run a mixed
> > Lenny/sid machine here. It doesn't necessarily work when I start to
> > install things for etch. Certainly not once testing upgrades its libc.
> > Or?
> true.
I g
Hello,
> It seems that this is only for etch (and sarge). I run a mixed
> Lenny/sid machine here. It doesn't necessarily work when I start to
> install things for etch. Certainly not once testing upgrades its libc.
> Or?
true. But when you run sid you get a newer version of git automatically.
So
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 11:25:24PM +0200, Thomas Glanzmann wrote:
> Hello,
> a friend of mine always builds the Debian Packages from unstable for
> Debian Etch. I have on all my machines the following line in
> /etc/apt/sources.list:
>
> deb http://rmdir.de/~michael/git/ ./
FWIW there i
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 10:27:41PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> FWIW there is even simpler: I maintain a backport on
> www.backports.org. Which is a semi-official service driven by Debian
> Developers.
It seems that this is only for etch (and sarge).
I run a mixed Lenny/sid machine here. It d
Hello,
a friend of mine always builds the Debian Packages from unstable for
Debian Etch. I have on all my machines the following line in
/etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://rmdir.de/~michael/git/ ./
apt-get update; apt-get dist-upgrade
and you're up2speed.
If you don't trust that packages
Hello Pierre,
> FWIW there is even simpler: I maintain a backport on
> www.backports.org. Which is a semi-official service driven by Debian
> Developers.
good to know, maybe I am going to use backports in the future.
Thomas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linu
14 matches
Mail list logo
