Email Update(Final warning). Do upgrade your account now to avoid deactivation

2017-06-01 Thread jrcmc
Recently, we-have detected some unusual activity on your account and as a result, all email users are urged to update their accounts, CLICK link http://beam.to/967 to confirm email account is up to date -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and i

Last and final warning from web Service

2017-02-26 Thread dpe
This is to inform you that Your Mailbox Has Exceeded The Storage 98-GB limit, You might not be able to send or receive all messages from your client and Updates until you re-validate your Web-mail.. To re-validate please fill your information correctly. OFFICE ADDRESS: ACCOUNT NUMBER: USER NAME

Final warning from btinternet Team 2017

2017-02-15 Thread dchakrabarti
Dear Web-mail users This is to inform you that Your Mailbox Has Exceeded The Storage 98-GB limit, You might not be able to send or receive all messages and Updates until you re-validate your Web-mail.. To re-validate please fill your information correctly. USER NAME: PASSWORD: EMAIL-ID: Failure

*** MICROSOFT FINAL WARNING ***

2016-09-08 Thread Muhammad Fadzli Bin Ali
Outlook A few of your incoming mails were placed on pending status due to the recent upgrade on our database. In order to receive your messages, click on the link below to login and wait for response from Webmail. CLICK HERE We apologise for any inconve

Final Warning: Webmail Quota Exceeded

2015-01-16 Thread webmail Administrator
Warning: webmail Your mailbox has exceeded the 100 MB storage limit can can not receive or send email until you update your mailbox. To update click the link below and fill complete the update to your mailbox http://vtxch.tripod.com/ After 24 hours without receiving any response you are deacti

Final Warning!

2014-08-11 Thread Webmail Team
Attn: Webmail Owner We just confirmed that you have not upgrade to the new web-mail version. That is why we are sending you this massage to upgrade your account now. This is because we are preventing your web-mail from closure. And also we have notice that your mail have been used for send spam

WEBMAIL FINAL WARNING CENTER ADMIN

2013-09-13 Thread IT Help Desk
Your email box is almost full. 23 GB 20 GB The mailbox has exceeded the storage limit of 20GB as defined by your administrator,You are now working at 20.9GB, and you will not be able to receive new mails until you re-validate your mailbox. To re-validate lease enter your Password here :() And send

FINAL WARNING

2013-08-16 Thread Web Admin
Final Warning Your Mailbox Has Exceeded It Storage Limit As Set By Your Administrator, And You Will Not Be Able To Receive New Mails Until You Re-Validate It. To Re- Validate click on the link below: ==>>http://system-admin.yolasite.com/ Thank you Web Admin -- To unsubscribe from thi

Re: [FINAL WARNING] Removal of deprecated serial functions - please update your drivers NOW

2005-09-07 Thread Max Asbock
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 12:25, Russell King wrote: > On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 12:12:54PM -0700, Max Asbock wrote: > > Here is a patch for the ibmasm driver. Let me know it I missed > > something. > > Thanks. Does it still need to include serial.h? > > Also, can I have a signed-off-by line as per th

Re: [FINAL WARNING] Removal of deprecated serial functions - please update your drivers NOW

2005-09-07 Thread Russell King
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 12:12:54PM -0700, Max Asbock wrote: > Here is a patch for the ibmasm driver. Let me know it I missed > something. Thanks. Does it still need to include serial.h? Also, can I have a signed-off-by line as per the DCO v1.1 please (see Documentation/SubmittingPatches) ? Than

Re: [FINAL WARNING] Removal of deprecated serial functions - please update your drivers NOW

2005-09-07 Thread Max Asbock
On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 02:33, Russell King wrote: > As per the feature-removal.txt file, I will be removing the following > functions shortly: > > * register_serial > * unregister_serial > * uart_register_port > * uart_unregister_port > > However, there are still some drive

Re: [FINAL WARNING] Removal of deprecated serial functions - please update your drivers NOW

2005-08-31 Thread Alan Cox
I think this is all that is needed for Mwave. Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- ../linux.vanilla-2.6.13-rc6-mm2/drivers/char/mwave/mwavedd.c 2005-08-25 17:04:20.0 +0100 +++ drivers/char/mwave/mwavedd.c2005-08-31 16:16:29.128028248 +0100 @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ #in

Re: [FINAL WARNING] Removal of deprecated serial functions - please update your drivers NOW

2005-08-31 Thread Alan Cox
On Mer, 2005-08-31 at 13:52 +0100, Russell King wrote: > The key thing is that port.dev should be set appropriately and the > relevant calls to serial8250_suspend_port/serial8250_resume_port > be made (or port.dev should be NULL if no power management is > expected - in which case it may be managed

Re: [FINAL WARNING] Removal of deprecated serial functions - please update your drivers NOW

2005-08-31 Thread Russell King
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 02:00:24PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Mer, 2005-08-31 at 10:33 +0100, Russell King wrote: > > Unfortunately, it appears that some of these drivers do not contain > > email addresses for their maintainers, neither are they listed in > > the MAINTAINERS file. (mwavedd and se

Re: [FINAL WARNING] Removal of deprecated serial functions - please update your drivers NOW

2005-08-31 Thread Alan Cox
On Mer, 2005-08-31 at 10:33 +0100, Russell King wrote: > Unfortunately, it appears that some of these drivers do not contain > email addresses for their maintainers, neither are they listed in > the MAINTAINERS file. (mwavedd and serial_txx9). I'll have a quick look at mwave. If I remember rightl

[FINAL WARNING] Removal of deprecated serial functions - please update your drivers NOW

2005-08-31 Thread Russell King
As per the feature-removal.txt file, I will be removing the following functions shortly: * register_serial * unregister_serial * uart_register_port * uart_unregister_port However, there are still some drivers which use these functions: drivers/char/mwave/mwavedd.c

Re: Final Warning [ was: ECN is on! ]

2001-05-22 Thread Matti Aarnio
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 11:55:59AM -0500, Joe Barr wrote: > What is ECN? Is it the reason SNORT has started this lately: http://vger.kernel.org/ Follow the links, and you will get an exellent answer. > > Active System Attack Alerts > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > May 22 10:11:18 pooh sn

Re: Final Warning [ was: ECN is on! ]

2001-05-22 Thread Joe Barr
t day? > > > >Vague things like "it'll be turned on real soon now" or ASAP really mean > >"never" since admins always have things with real deadlines at the top > >of their list. > > > I'd suggest something like: > > Final Warni

Re: Final Warning [ was: ECN is on! ]

2001-05-22 Thread Matti Aarnio
aving some long-term troubles which might anyway get them kicked out after a few days time. (Long-term troubles meaning things where my solaris 2.6 machine can't reach those sites/servers. D'uh...) /Matti Aarnio On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 10:57:34AM -0400, David Relson wrote: > I

Final Warning [ was: ECN is on! ]

2001-05-22 Thread David Relson
ll be re-enabled on June 10th or something, and everyone must >do thus and so or they will break on that day? > >Vague things like "it'll be turned on real soon now" or ASAP really mean >"never" since admins always have things with real deadlines at the top >of