Hello Mike, hello Linus,
Some minutes ago, I wrote:
> I think I have found the reason for our bugs. It seems GCC really
> miscompiles buffer.c:bdflush_init without frame pointers. I'll try harder
> now to understand what excactly is going on, but it seems it is smashing
> its local stack space by
On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 08:40:50PM + or thereabouts, Thorsten Kranzkowski wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 06:09:35AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > I wouldn't (not going to here;) spend a lot of time on it. The compiler
> > has problems. It won't build glibc-2.2, and chokes horribly on ip
On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 06:09:35AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> I wouldn't (not going to here;) spend a lot of time on it. The compiler
> has problems. It won't build glibc-2.2, and chokes horribly on ipchains.
>
> int ipt_register_table(struct ipt_table *table)
> {
> int ret;
> s
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Andreas Franck wrote:
> Hello Mike, hello linux-kernel hackers,
>
> Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > I wouldn't (not going to here;) spend a lot of time on it. The compiler
> > has problems. It won't build glibc-2.2, and chokes horribly on ipchains.
>
> Maybe, but you were lucky
On Mon, 25 Dec 2000, Andreas Franck wrote:
> Hello Mike, hello linux-kernel hackers,
>
> Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > I wouldn't (not going to here;) spend a lot of time on it. The compiler
> > has problems. It won't build glibc-2.2, and chokes horribly on ipchains.
>
> Maybe, but after having s
Hello Mike, hello linux-kernel hackers,
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> I wouldn't (not going to here;) spend a lot of time on it. The compiler
> has problems. It won't build glibc-2.2, and chokes horribly on ipchains.
Maybe, but after having spent several hours debugging now, I think it was
worth it
Hello Mike, hello linux-kernel hackers,
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> I wouldn't (not going to here;) spend a lot of time on it. The compiler
> has problems. It won't build glibc-2.2, and chokes horribly on ipchains.
Maybe, but you were lucky getting an ICE, and not silently failing code :-)
After
On Sun, 24 Dec 2000, Andreas Franck wrote:
> Hello Mike, hello linux-kernel hackers,
>
> Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > Yes, hmm indeed. Try these two things.
> >
> > 1. make DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED(sem) in bdflush_init() static.
> > 2. compile with frame pointers. (normal case for IKD)
> >
> > M
Hello Mike, hello linux-kernel hackers,
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Yes, hmm indeed. Try these two things.
>
> 1. make DECLARE_MUTEX_LOCKED(sem) in bdflush_init() static.
> 2. compile with frame pointers. (normal case for IKD)
>
> My IKD tree works with either option, but not with neither. I ha
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Andreas Franck wrote:
> Hi Mike, hello linux-kernel audience,
>
> > I had the same, with the last few snapshots I tried, but 20001218 seems
> > to work ok.
> > dmesg|head -1
> > Linux version 2.4.0-test13ikd (root@el-kaboom) (gcc version gcc-2.97
> > 20001218 (experimental))
The story continues, citing myself:
> Hmm, would have been nice, but it crashes here with 20001222, nevertheless.
> For which CPU do you have your kernel configured? It might be a CPU
> specific issue, I'll try to compile for Pentium I and 486, now, and report
> my results.
It does not seem CP
Hi Mike, hello linux-kernel audience,
> I had the same, with the last few snapshots I tried, but 20001218 seems
> to work ok.
> dmesg|head -1
> Linux version 2.4.0-test13ikd (root@el-kaboom) (gcc version gcc-2.97
> 20001218 (experimental)) #18 Sat Dec 23 17:43:29 CET 2000
Hmm, would have been ni
On Sat, 23 Dec 2000, Andreas Franck wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I hope I am not doing something particularly stupid here, but as Linus
> encouraged curious people to try compiling the kernel with the
> latest gcc snapshots, I have tried - as several weeks before, but again
> in vain.
>
> Since I have t
Hello,
I hope I am not doing something particularly stupid here, but as Linus
encouraged curious people to try compiling the kernel with the
latest gcc snapshots, I have tried - as several weeks before, but again
in vain.
Since I have tried, the same following error on early boot (just after
"St
14 matches
Mail list logo
