On 5/3/07, David Greaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2007, Miguel Sousa Filipe wrote:
>
>> On 5/2/07, Diego Calleja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> El Wed, 2 May 2007 20:18:55 +0100, "Miguel Sousa Filipe"
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>>>
>>> > I find
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2007, Miguel Sousa Filipe wrote:
>
>> On 5/2/07, Diego Calleja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> El Wed, 2 May 2007 20:18:55 +0100, "Miguel Sousa Filipe"
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>>>
>>> > I find it high irritanting having two kernel interfaces and
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Miguel Sousa Filipe wrote:
On 5/2/07, Diego Calleja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
El Wed, 2 May 2007 20:18:55 +0100, "Miguel Sousa Filipe"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> I find it high irritanting having two kernel interfaces and two
> userland tools that provide the same
On 5/2/07, Diego Calleja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
El Wed, 2 May 2007 20:18:55 +0100, "Miguel Sousa Filipe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> I find it high irritanting having two kernel interfaces and two
> userland tools that provide the same funcionality, which one should I
> use?
I doubt us
El Wed, 2 May 2007 20:18:55 +0100, "Miguel Sousa Filipe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
escribió:
> I find it high irritanting having two kernel interfaces and two
> userland tools that provide the same funcionality, which one should I
> use?
I doubt users care about kernel's design; however the lack of un
Hello kernel hackers,
Some weeks ago, in a ZFS related thread, some kernel hackers asked the
user what did they liked in ZFS that linux didn't have, so that they
could (possibly) work on it.
So, here is my feature request:
- merge MD software raid framework and LVM in one unique
API/framework, t
6 matches
Mail list logo
