Aaron Sethman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You might want to take a look at using reiserfs on the 130GB partition, as
> its is journalled and doesn't need to be fsck'ed.
No.
All journaling filesystems need to be fsck'ed.
A correctly operating one simply doesn't need to be fsck'ed because
of
You might want to take a look at using reiserfs on the 130GB partition, as
its is journalled and doesn't need to be fsck'ed. Take a look a
http://devlinux.com/namesys/
Aaron
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Roberto Fichera wrote:
> At 19.00 21/11/00 +0100, Jakob Østergaard wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Nov 21, 200
Roberto Fichera writes:
> I'm configuring a Compaq ML350 2x800PIII, 1Gb RAM, 5x36Gb UWS3 RAID 5
> with Smart Array 4300, as database SQL server. So I need to chose
> between a single partition of 130Gb or multiple small partitions,
> depending by the performance.
It is usually better to have mul
At 19.00 21/11/00 +0100, Jakob Østergaard wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 05:58:58PM +0100, Roberto Fichera wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I need to know if there are some differences, in performances, between
> > a ext2 filesystem in a 10Gb partition and another that reside in a 130Gb,
> > each one
On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 05:58:58PM +0100, Roberto Fichera wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I need to know if there are some differences, in performances, between
> a ext2 filesystem in a 10Gb partition and another that reside in a 130Gb,
> each one have 4Kb block size.
>
> I'm configuring a Compaq ML350 2x8
Hi All,
I need to know if there are some differences, in performances, between
a ext2 filesystem in a 10Gb partition and another that reside in a 130Gb,
each one have 4Kb block size.
I'm configuring a Compaq ML350 2x800PIII, 1Gb RAM, 5x36Gb UWS3 RAID 5
with Smart Array 4300, as database SQL serv
6 matches
Mail list logo
