On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> No idea on the sensors stuff
i'll go nag them again. :)
regards,
--
Paul Jakma [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt
---
Fortune:
You will lose an important dis
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > like i said, their code has worked well for me, but they seem intent
> > on keeping it as obscure as possible... (i remember someone posted to
> No idea on the sensors stuff
Whats keeping lm78 from being integrated into 2.4?
-Dan
-
To unsubscribe from th
> it is? i don't see the sensors stuff, so you must mean just the i2c
> bits. Any word on whether we'll see sensors code go in to 2.4?
The i2c bits
> like i said, their code has worked well for me, but they seem intent
> on keeping it as obscure as possible... (i remember someone posted to
No i
It's in 2.4? Where?
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > do these guys /ever/ plan on submitting kernel patches? i used to use
> > lm_sensors on 2.2 cause it was fairly painless - but just havn't
> > bothered with 2.4 cause it was a pita when i tried.
>
> Its in 2.4 it wont be in 2.2 I suspect
--
=
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> Its in 2.4 it wont be in 2.2 I suspect
it is? i don't see the sensors stuff, so you must mean just the i2c
bits. Any word on whether we'll see sensors code go in to 2.4?
like i said, their code has worked well for me, but they seem intent
on keeping it as
> do these guys /ever/ plan on submitting kernel patches? i used to use
> lm_sensors on 2.2 cause it was fairly painless - but just havn't
> bothered with 2.4 cause it was a pita when i tried.
Its in 2.4 it wont be in 2.2 I suspect
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe lin
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
> Hit http://www.lm-sensors.nu/
do these guys /ever/ plan on submitting kernel patches? i used to use
lm_sensors on 2.2 cause it was fairly painless - but just havn't
bothered with 2.4 cause it was a pita when i tried.
i know they talked AC at some
Looks like their dns server is borked. I can't even get to their site.
David Ford wrote:
>
> "Mohammad A. Haque" wrote:
>
> > Hit http://www.lm-sensors.nu/
>
> does anyone have an IP address for cvs.lm-sensors.nu?
>
> -d
--
==
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 04:55:02PM -, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> This probably is not the right lpace, but can't think of where else to ask
>
> Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate the
> enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many motherboards provide
> v
Try this patch against the 2.5.x series. I submitted it to them back
when it broke with test8 but never checked if it made it in.
philippe wrote:
>
> lm_sensors 2.4.5 work fine for my abit bp6
> cannot succed to use 2.5.x serie
--
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GM> Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GM>
>> [Andrew Stubbs]
>> > Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate
>> > the enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many
"Mohammad A. Haque" wrote:
> Hit http://www.lm-sensors.nu/
does anyone have an IP address for cvs.lm-sensors.nu?
-d
begin:vcard
n:Ford;David
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
url:www.blue-labs.org
adr:;;
version:2.1
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Blue Labs Developer
note;quoted-printable:GPG
Hello,
I have a patch for lm_sensors to match changes in 2.4.0-testxx. It is
available at:
http://www.lostland.net/~jimbud/patches/lm_sensors-2.5.2-2.4.x.patch.gz
Regards,
Adrian
On 10 Dec 2000, Graham Murray wrote:
> Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > [Andrew Stubbs]
> > >
> Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > [Andrew Stubbs]
> > > Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate
> > > the enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many
> > > motherboards provide via their bios's ?
> >
> > Do a search on 'lm_sensors'.
>
> D
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [Andrew Stubbs]
> > Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate
> > the enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many
> > motherboards provide via their bios's ?
>
> Do a search on 'lm_sensors'.
Does this work with t
Hit http://www.lm-sensors.nu/
Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate the
> enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many motherboards provide
> via their bios's ?
>
> Please point me in the right direction
--
===
[Andrew Stubbs]
> Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate
> the enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many
> motherboards provide via their bios's ?
Do a search on 'lm_sensors'.
Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kerne
This probably is not the right lpace, but can't think of where else to ask
Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate the
enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many motherboards provide
via their bios's ?
Please point me in the right direction
Andrew
-
To u
18 matches
Mail list logo
