Re: Device Numbers, LILO

2001-05-15 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Tim Fletcher wrote: > > > It's in, but for some strange reason you have to ask for it explicitly > > with the "lba32" option. > > Because the 32bit bios calls lilo uses in lba32 mode can cause problems > with broken or old bios's hence is defaults to a safe option, and if you > can't boot withou

Re: Device Numbers, LILO

2001-05-15 Thread Tim Fletcher
> It's in, but for some strange reason you have to ask for it explicitly > with the "lba32" option. Because the 32bit bios calls lilo uses in lba32 mode can cause problems with broken or old bios's hence is defaults to a safe option, and if you can't boot without it (over 1023 cylinders) then you

Re: Device Numbers, LILO

2001-05-15 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> By author:mirabilos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > >That's not the issue. LILO takes whatever you pass to root= and converts > >it to a device number at /sbin/lilo time. An idiotic practice on the > >part of LILO, in my opinion, that

Re: Device Numbers, LILO

2001-05-15 Thread Nico Schottelius
mirabilos wrote: > >That's not the issue. LILO takes whatever you pass to root= and converts > >it to a device number at /sbin/lilo time. An idiotic practice on the > >part of LILO, in my opinion, that ought to have been fixed a long time > >ago. > > That's why you have to use append="root=bla

Re: Device Numbers, LILO

2001-05-15 Thread mirabilos
>That's not the issue. LILO takes whatever you pass to root= and converts >it to a device number at /sbin/lilo time. An idiotic practice on the >part of LILO, in my opinion, that ought to have been fixed a long time >ago. That's why you have to use append="root=blah" for devfs :) Really it shou