On Tuesday 29 March 2005 07:20, Bouchard, Sebastien wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm in the process of writing a linux driver and I have a question in
> regards to tasklet :
>
> Is it ok to have large delay "udelay(1000);" in the tasklet?
>
> If not, what should I do?
>
If the hardware can tolerate longer a l
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Davide Rossetti wrote:
Bouchard, Sebastien wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the process of writing a linux driver and I have a question in
regards to tasklet :
Is it ok to have large delay "udelay(1000);" in the tasklet?
If not, what should I do?
Please send the answer to me personally (I'm n
On 30/03/2005 12:50:01 linux-kernel-owner wrote:
>> I'd be interested in the answer as well. I have a driver which does
>> udelay(100), so no 1000 but anyway, and of course I end up having the
X86_64
>> kernel happily crying. I'm moving to a little state-machine to allow
for a
>> multi-pass appr
> I'd be interested in the answer as well. I have a driver which does
> udelay(100), so no 1000 but anyway, and of course I end up having the X86_64
> kernel happily crying. I'm moving to a little state-machine to allow for a
> multi-pass approach instead of busy-polling..
> regards
schedule_timeo
Bouchard, Sebastien wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the process of writing a linux driver and I have a question in
regards to tasklet :
Is it ok to have large delay "udelay(1000);" in the tasklet?
If not, what should I do?
Please send the answer to me personally (I'm not subscribe to the mailling
list) :
I'
Hi,
I'm in the process of writing a linux driver and I have a question in
regards to tasklet :
Is it ok to have large delay "udelay(1000);" in the tasklet?
If not, what should I do?
Please send the answer to me personally (I'm not subscribe to the mailling
list) :
Sebastien Bouchard
Software
6 matches
Mail list logo
