On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 01:54:13PM +0800, Rong Chen wrote:
>
>
> On 5/18/20 5:47 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 02:36:26PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > >
> > > > On May 14, 2020, at 2:13 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Fair enough! And yes, the Linu
On 5/18/20 5:47 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 02:36:26PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
On May 14, 2020, at 2:13 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
Fair enough! And yes, the Linux kernel is quite large, so I certainly am
not asking you to test the whole thing yourself.
Ok, I saw
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 02:36:26PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
>
>
> > On May 14, 2020, at 2:13 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > Fair enough! And yes, the Linux kernel is quite large, so I certainly am
> > not asking you to test the whole thing yourself.
>
> Ok, I saw 0day bot also started to r
> On May 14, 2020, at 2:13 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> Fair enough! And yes, the Linux kernel is quite large, so I certainly am
> not asking you to test the whole thing yourself.
Ok, I saw 0day bot also started to report those which is good. For example,
lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/12/1358
wh
;
> >>>>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 08:31:13AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On May 14, 2020, at 8:25 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
&g
; On May 14, 2020, at 8:25 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Paul,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This patch in the rcu tree
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> d13
McKenney wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 08:31:13AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On May 14, 2020, at 8:25 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>&g
rote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On May 14, 2020, at 8:25 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Paul,
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch in the rcu tree
>>>>>
>>>&g
, Stephen Rothwell
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Paul,
> >>>
> >>> This patch in the rcu tree
> >>>
> >>> d13fee049fa8 ("Default enable RCU list lockdep debugging with PROVE_RCU")
> >&g
> On May 14, 2020, at 9:33 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 08:31:13AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On May 14, 2020, at 8:25 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Paul,
>>>
>>> This patch in th
> On May 14, 2020, at 9:33 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 08:31:13AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On May 14, 2020, at 8:25 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Paul,
>>>
>>> This patch in th
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 08:31:13AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
>
>
> > On May 14, 2020, at 8:25 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > This patch in the rcu tree
> >
> > d13fee049fa8 ("Default enable RCU list lockdep debugging
> On May 14, 2020, at 8:25 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> This patch in the rcu tree
>
> d13fee049fa8 ("Default enable RCU list lockdep debugging with PROVE_RCU")
>
> is causing whack-a-mole in the syzbot testing of linux-next. Beca
Hi Paul,
This patch in the rcu tree
d13fee049fa8 ("Default enable RCU list lockdep debugging with PROVE_RCU")
is causing whack-a-mole in the syzbot testing of linux-next. Because
they always do a debug build of linux-next, no testing is getting done. :-(
Can we find another way t
14 matches
Mail list logo
