Re: Decreasing stime running confuses top (was: top displaying 9999% CPU usage)

2007-10-04 Thread Luca Tettamanti
Il Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 01:32:44AM +0200, Frans Pop ha scritto: > On Wednesday 03 October 2007, you wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 09:27:41PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > > On Wednesday 03 October 2007, you wrote: > > > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Fr

Re: Decreasing stime running confuses top (was: top displaying 9999% CPU usage)

2007-10-03 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 03 October 2007, you wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 09:27:41PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > > On Wednesday 03 October 2007, you wrote: > > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > > > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Frans Pop wrote: > > > > > The only change is in 2 consecutive columns: "2911

Re: Decreasing stime running confuses top (was: top displaying 9999% CPU usage)

2007-10-03 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 09:27:41PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 03 October 2007, you wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Frans Pop wrote: > > > > The only change is in 2 consecutive columns: "2911 502" -> "2912 > > > > 500". Is processor usage cal

Decreasing stime running confuses top (was: top displaying 9999% CPU usage)

2007-10-03 Thread Frans Pop
On Wednesday 03 October 2007, you wrote: > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Frans Pop wrote: > > > The only change is in 2 consecutive columns: "2911 502" -> "2912 > > > 500". Is processor usage calculated from those? Can someone explain > > > how? > > > > The latter