Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Here might be one of the resons for the trouble with VIA chipsets:
> >
> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/18267.html
> >
> > Some DMA error corrupting data, sounds like a really nasty bug. The
> > information is minimal on that page.
>
> What an
On Sat, 14 Apr 2001, Dan Podeanu wrote:
> On 13 Apr 2001, Doug McNaught wrote:
>
> > Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > > Here might be one of the resons for the trouble with VIA chipsets:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/18267.html
> > > >
> > > > Some DMA error
On 13 Apr 2001, Doug McNaught wrote:
> Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Here might be one of the resons for the trouble with VIA chipsets:
> > >
> > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/18267.html
> > >
> > > Some DMA error corrupting data, sounds like a really nasty bug. The
> >
Alan Cox wrote:
> > Is this problem likely to affect 2.2.X? I have a VIA-based board on
> > order (Tyan Trinity) and I don't plan to run 2.4 on it anytime soon
> > (it's upgrading a stock RH6.2 box).
> >
> > Am I safe if I stay in PIO mode?
>
> I have received exactly zero reports of 2.2 proble
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is this problem likely to affect 2.2.X? I have a VIA-based board on
> > order (Tyan Trinity) and I don't plan to run 2.4 on it anytime soon
> > (it's upgrading a stock RH6.2 box).
> >
> > Am I safe if I stay in PIO mode?
>
> I have received exactly zero
> Is this problem likely to affect 2.2.X? I have a VIA-based board on
> order (Tyan Trinity) and I don't plan to run 2.4 on it anytime soon
> (it's upgrading a stock RH6.2 box).
>
> Am I safe if I stay in PIO mode?
I have received exactly zero reports of 2.2 problems, and as the 2.2 maintainer
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Here might be one of the resons for the trouble with VIA chipsets:
> >
> > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/18267.html
> >
> > Some DMA error corrupting data, sounds like a really nasty bug. The
> > information is minimal on that page.
>
> What an
> These are the things, that one of the German links[1] suggest
> (translated only, because I'm not the IDE guy ;-)):
>
>- PCI Delay Transaction = 0 (off) (Register 0x70, Bit 1)
>- PCI Master Read Caching = 0 (off) (Register 0x70, Bit 2)
>- PCI Latency = 0 (values between 0 and 32
> Here might be one of the resons for the trouble with VIA chipsets:
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/18267.html
>
> Some DMA error corrupting data, sounds like a really nasty bug. The
> information is minimal on that page.
What annoys me is that we've known about the problem for _age
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:00:32AM +0200, Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> Here might be one of the resons for the trouble with VIA chipsets:
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/18267.html
>
> Some DMA error corrupting data, sounds like a really nasty bug. The
> information is minimal on that pa
Here might be one of the resons for the trouble with VIA chipsets:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/18267.html
Some DMA error corrupting data, sounds like a really nasty bug. The
information is minimal on that page.
I just bought one of these babies and I should probably return it
directl
11 matches
Mail list logo
