Trent Piepho wrote:
> This is not correct. The dvb_attach() system has no assumption that it will
> be used for a front-end device. There are already users which are not
> front-ends, such as tuners or lnb supply control chips,
SEC (aka Satellite Equipment Control) is a part of the frontend.
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Manu Abraham wrote:
> > I've been aware of the problem with dst not fully using the dvb
> > customization
> > systems(*) for a long time. It came up when dvb_attach() et al were first
> > being integrated, well before any rejected patches or strongly worded emails
> > or whate
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 07 May 2007 17:54:29 -0300
Von: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. w
Michael Krufky wrote:
> Manu Abraham wrote:
>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Hi Manu,
>>>
From my side, quite some time has been put forward to write that mail.
Inspite of that if you feel that you do have to go your own way, then
it is completely upto you. I would say: do as you
Manu Abraham wrote:
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> Hi Manu,
>>
>>> From my side, quite some time has been put forward to write that mail.
>>> Inspite of that if you feel that you do have to go your own way, then
>>> it is completely upto you. I would say: do as you feel in such a case.
>> The po
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi Manu,
>
>> From my side, quite some time has been put forward to write that mail.
>> Inspite of that if you feel that you do have to go your own way, then
>> it is completely upto you. I would say: do as you feel in such a case.
>
> The point is that those issues
Hi Manu,
> From my side, quite some time has been put forward to write that mail.
> Inspite of that if you feel that you do have to go your own way, then
> it is completely upto you. I would say: do as you feel in such a case.
The point is that those issues are pending for a long time, and they
s
Hello Mauro,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi Manu,
>
> Em Qui, 2007-05-03 às 23:03 +0400, Manu Abraham escreveu:
>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>>> Enough. Let's stop arguing non technical issues.
>>>
>>> If either one of you have any technical argue against the Trent's
>>> patches, please poi
Hi Manu,
Em Qui, 2007-05-03 às 23:03 +0400, Manu Abraham escreveu:
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Enough. Let's stop arguing non technical issues.
> >
> > If either one of you have any technical argue against the Trent's
> > patches, please point where the fix is wrong. Otherwise, if you wish
> > It would be nice, however, to have a patch making dvb_attach more
> > generic, by e.g. having a variant that allows passing another message.
>
> Only this message is from dvb_attach():
> > DVB: Unable to find symbol dst_attach()
>
> Is it saying that it cannot load the module that dst_attach(
On Thu, 3 May 2007, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Qua, 2007-05-02 ??s 04:10 -0700, Trent Piepho escreveu:
> > I promise, this time it's right!
> > http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/dst-new
>
> Confirmed. Now the patch is properly working. My tests were done with a
> board with DST. Those are the resul
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 04 May 2007 02:31:49 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
> Markus Rechber
Am Freitag, den 04.05.2007, 02:31 +0400 schrieb Manu Abraham:
> Markus Rechberger wrote:
>
> > I mean the mail from Helge Hafting (thread [linux-dvb] Critical
> > points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities) at the very first
> > beginning.
> >
>
> I am replying to this mail, just because
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 4 May 2007 00:06:51 +0200
Von: "Markus Rechberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: "Manu Abraham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module
On 5/4/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
> I mean the mail from Helge Hafting (thread [linux-dvb] Critical
> points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities) at the very first
> beginning.
>
I am replying to this mail, just because someone's spreading lies
Markus Rechberger wrote:
> I mean the mail from Helge Hafting (thread [linux-dvb] Critical
> points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities) at the very first
> beginning.
>
I am replying to this mail, just because someone's spreading lies all
around.
On the mentioned thread, what i wrote (a
On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
> On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> > Enough. Let's stop arguing non technical issues.
>> >
>> > If either one of you have any technical argue against the Trent's
>> > p
Markus Rechberger wrote:
> On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> > Enough. Let's stop arguing non technical issues.
>> >
>> > If either one of you have any technical argue against the Trent's
>> > patches, please point where the fix is wrong. Otherwis
On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Enough. Let's stop arguing non technical issues.
>
> If either one of you have any technical argue against the Trent's
> patches, please point where the fix is wrong. Otherwise, if you wish,
> you may send an acked-
On 5/3/07, VDR User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
STOP FIGHTING ALL THE DAMN TIME! From an outsiders perspective there
is a lot of unnecessary & childish behavior going on at the expense of
good ideas and coding. It seems as though the Markus/Mauro team will
go against anything Manu says simply be
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Enough. Let's stop arguing non technical issues.
>
> If either one of you have any technical argue against the Trent's
> patches, please point where the fix is wrong. Otherwise, if you wish,
> you may send an acked-by agreeing with the fix.
>
Why don't you stop thi
On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Markus Rechberger wrote:
> Manu,
>
> to me it looks like your attitude is not acceptable here, I sent
> several mails already which you just use to ignore.
You very well know the reason why i am ignoring your mails. You just
tend to flame peop
Michael Krufky wrote:
> Manu Abraham wrote:
>> Uwe Bugla wrote:
>>
>>> If you download the thing as tar.bz2 you get a zero file down.
>>>
>> I think could be a bug in hgweb probably.
> [snip]
>> Let me see why hgweb gives a zero length archive
>>
> Manu,
>
> We reported this bug to the
Manu Abraham wrote:
> Uwe Bugla wrote:
>
>> If you download the thing as tar.bz2 you get a zero file down.
>>
>
> I think could be a bug in hgweb probably.
[snip]
> Let me see why hgweb gives a zero length archive
>
Manu,
We reported this bug to the selenic guys quite a long time ago...
rg, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
> On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Uwe Bugla wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Manu,
> > >
> > &g
Markus Rechberger wrote:
> Manu,
>
> to me it looks like your attitude is not acceptable here, I sent
> several mails already which you just use to ignore.
You very well know the reason why i am ignoring your mails. You just
tend to flame people for nothing. I tend to ignore the flamers.
> If
ED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
> points about ...)
>
>> Uwe Bugla wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Manu,
>>>
>>> But it would be an acceptable compromise FOR NOW, wouldn't
: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
> Uwe Bugla wrote:
>
> > Hi Manu,
> >
> > But it would be an acceptable compromise FOR NOW, wouldn't it?
>
>
> The reason is i do not wish to make changes to it, ti
On 5/3/07, Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Uwe Bugla wrote:
> Hi Manu,
>
> But it would be an acceptable compromise FOR NOW, wouldn't it?
The reason is i do not wish to make changes to it, till i can fix it. It
is indeed hard to fix things that support a lot of devices, with
different
Uwe Bugla wrote:
> Hi Manu,
>
> But it would be an acceptable compromise FOR NOW, wouldn't it?
The reason is i do not wish to make changes to it, till i can fix it. It
is indeed hard to fix things that support a lot of devices, with
different issues. There are enough of issues in there.
You ca
: DST/BT878 module customization (.. was:
Critical points about ...)
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Qua, 2007-05-02 às 04:10 -0700, Trent Piepho escreveu:
> >> On Tue, 1 May 2007, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >
> >>> However, when dst is selected,
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 03 May 2007 18:44:36 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Qua, 2007-05-02 às 04:10 -0700, Trent Piepho escreveu:
>> On Tue, 1 May 2007, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>
>>> However, when dst is selected, I got those errors:
>> When I made this patch I was basing it off a patch I made around 9 months
>> ago. I thought sinc
Uwe Bugla wrote:
> On the technical layer I noticed that I heard some Pinnacle relais click
> during testing, but there were some i2c_bus symbols missing during
> compilation. So I guess those missing symbols are responsible for getting
> neither picture nor sound.
Can you send your compile wa
Em Qua, 2007-05-02 às 04:10 -0700, Trent Piepho escreveu:
> On Tue, 1 May 2007, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > However, when dst is selected, I got those errors:
>
> When I made this patch I was basing it off a patch I made around 9 months
> ago. I thought since that one was ok, this would be
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 02 May 2007 20:45:58 +0400
Von: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: Uwe Bugla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points
OTECTED]>, Linux Kernel Mailing list
, [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jan
Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux DVB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was:
Criticalpoints about ...)
>
>> Trent Pi
L PROTECTED], Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux DVB <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
> points about ...)
>
>> Trent Piepho wrote:
>>> On Tue, 1
L PROTECTED], Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux DVB <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>
> Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
> points about ...)
>
>> Trent Piepho wrote:
>>> On Tue, 1
D]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], Linux DVB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
> Trent Piepho wrote:
> > On Tue, 1 May 2007, Simon Arlott wrote:
> >> On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechb
Trent Piepho wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2007, Simon Arlott wrote:
>> On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wrote:
>>> From my side I do not see any problem with that patch, if someone else
>>> has a problem with it please state out the reason.
>> I have no problem with the patch since it has nothing to
: DST/BT878 module customization (.. was:
Critical points about ...)
> On Tue, 1 May 2007, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Ter, 2007-05-01 Ã s 16:16 -0700, Trent Piepho escreveu:
> > > On Tue, 1 May 2007, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Ter, 2007-05-01 ??s 16:16 -0700, Trent Piepho escreveu:
> > On Tue, 1 May 2007, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > With this configuration, dvb-bt8xx hangs during initialization,
> > > generating an OOPS, if you have a board with DST (modprobe d
Em Ter, 2007-05-01 às 16:16 -0700, Trent Piepho escreveu:
> On Tue, 1 May 2007, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > With this configuration, dvb-bt8xx hangs during initialization,
> > generating an OOPS, if you have a board with DST (modprobe dvb-bt8xx
> > never returns).
>
> Stupid typo in the first
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> With this configuration, dvb-bt8xx hangs during initialization,
> generating an OOPS, if you have a board with DST (modprobe dvb-bt8xx
> never returns).
Stupid typo in the first patch, a != should have been ==.
Fixed:
http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/d
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Simon Arlott wrote:
> On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> > From my side I do not see any problem with that patch, if someone else
> > has a problem with it please state out the reason.
>
> I have no problem with the patch since it has nothing to do with my DVB
> card
: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
> On 01/05/07 20:34, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> > Original-Nachricht
> > Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 19:50:38 +0100
> > Von: Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> On
On 01/05/07 20:34, Uwe Bugla wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 19:50:38 +0100
Von: Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 01/05/07 19:30, Uwe Bugla wrote:
If you would avoid making inflammatory comments, the people who are trying
to
help you will be more inclin
: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
> On 01/05/07 19:30, Uwe Bugla wrote:
> >
>
> If you would avoid making inflammatory comments, the people who are trying
> to
> help you will be more inclined to fix the problems that th
: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
> Uwe Bugla wrote:
> >
> > The biggest problem that I had with you in the past weeks is and was
> that you never even once offer full transparency when you are building up
> theses NOT TO acce
Uwe Bugla wrote:
>
> The biggest problem that I had with you in the past weeks is and was that you
> never even once offer full transparency when you are building up theses NOT
> TO accept patches.
>
> And if it is only the other side (me, Trent, others) to be forced to offer
> transparent inf
On 01/05/07 19:30, Uwe Bugla wrote:
If you would avoid making inflammatory comments, the people who are trying to
help you will be more inclined to fix the problems that these patches DO cause
so they can be added.
A while ago, you went on and on about your broken floppy drive and how peop
ff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
>
> Original-Nachricht
> Datum: Tue, 01 May 2007 11:55:33 -0300
> Von: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: Markus Rechberger <[EMAIL PRO
: DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
> Hi Markus,
>
> Em Seg, 2007-04-30 às 23:17 +0200, Markus Rechberger escreveu:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Trent Piepho wrote another patch for it, it just completes Uwe's patch
> > in the end.
>
Hi Markus,
Em Seg, 2007-04-30 às 23:17 +0200, Markus Rechberger escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> Trent Piepho wrote another patch for it, it just completes Uwe's patch
> in the end.
>
> http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/dst-new?cmd=changeset;node=bbdd2b53cd5c;style=gitweb
The above patch plus the other on
http://l
Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] DST/BT878 module customization (.. was: Critical
points about ...)
> On 5/1/07, Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wr
On 5/1/07, Simon Arlott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wrote:
> Trent Piepho wrote another patch for it, it just completes Uwe's patch
> in the end.
> From my side I do not see any problem with that patch, if someone else
> has a problem with it please state out t
On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wrote:
Trent Piepho wrote another patch for it, it just completes Uwe's patch
in the end.
From my side I do not see any problem with that patch, if someone else
has a problem with it please state out the reason.
I have no problem with the patch since it has
Hi,
Trent Piepho wrote another patch for it, it just completes Uwe's patch
in the end.
http://linuxtv.org/hg/~tap/dst-new?cmd=changeset;node=bbdd2b53cd5c;style=gitweb
as far as I see from that patch it cleans up a memory leak which would
happen when the system tries to load the dst module if it
59 matches
Mail list logo
