Re: d-link dfe-530 tx (bug-report)

2001-02-06 Thread Jonathan Morton
I just installed Urban's most recent patch, and I still get much the same problems when I reboot from Windows. The main difference appears to be that there's a few seconds' pause during the via-rhine driver initialisation (presumably while it tries to find PHY devices), and there aren't quite so

Re: d-link dfe-530 tx (bug-report)

2001-02-05 Thread Thomas Stewart
On 5 Feb 2001, at 11:58, Manfred Spraul wrote: > Thomas Stewart wrote: > Several regs are just the wakeup frames, but some look suspicious. > > Could you try Urban's patch, but add > > > writeb(0x00, ioaddr + 0x83); > writel(0x0101, ioaddr + 0xa0); > writel(0x0101, ioaddr +

Re: d-link dfe-530 tx (bug-report)

2001-02-05 Thread ksa1
hi! ..I installed Manfred's patch and the d-link-card was now able to reset after the tx-timeout-error. that means that the card was again reachable after the error. but the smb-transfer-connection-error still appeared. then I set "static int debug = 2;" in the patched via-rhine.c to get more deb

Re: d-link dfe-530 tx (bug-report)

2001-02-05 Thread Manfred Spraul
Thomas Stewart wrote: > > Right, i patched the via-diag and its showing more regs. > > I applyed Manfred's patch but that changed nothing. > Then I applyed your patch and still changed nothing as you suspected. > But there are regs that are different. > Several regs are just the wakeup frames,

Re: d-link dfe-530 tx (bug-report)

2001-02-05 Thread Thomas Stewart
On 5 Feb 2001, at 9:38, Manfred Spraul wrote: > That's expected, my patch fixes another bug. > The NIC now recover from "Tx timeout" messages. ksa confirmed that, > but there is still a delay of a few seconds. I'll try to fix that. > > > Then I applyed your patch and still changed nothing as you

Re: d-link dfe-530 tx (bug-report)

2001-02-05 Thread Urban Widmark
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote: > 6 ms is quite long: > I added a reset into tx_timeout, and that function should not take more > than 1 ms or so. > Did you find something about the delay in the documentation? Is it > possible to poll for reset completion? I don't know how long. For te

Re: d-link dfe-530 tx (bug-report)

2001-02-05 Thread Manfred Spraul
Thomas Stewart wrote: > > > > > CmdReset is not instant, it may need a delay. There is also a "force > > software reset" operation that sounds good, I assume that one also > > could use a delay so I gave it 6ms. > > 6 ms is quite long: I added a reset into tx_timeout, and that function should no

Re: d-link dfe-530 tx (bug-report)

2001-02-04 Thread Thomas Stewart
On 4 Feb 2001, at 23:31, Urban Widmark wrote: > On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Manfred wrote: > > > Ok, I've attached a patch that performs an unconditional reset in > > tx_timeout(). > > > > I don't have the hardware, could you test it? > > The changed startup code doesn't break anything for me. > > >

Re: d-link dfe-530 tx (bug-report)

2001-02-04 Thread Manfred
Urban Widmark wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote: > > > > Oh, that's known already. They haven't released any info on the older > > > "VT3043" chip either, afaik. And the vt86c100a.pdf document is just a > > > preliminary version. > > > > > Where can I find that file? > > I'll t

Re: d-link dfe-530 tx (bug-report)

2001-02-04 Thread Urban Widmark
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote: > > Oh, that's known already. They haven't released any info on the older > > "VT3043" chip either, afaik. And the vt86c100a.pdf document is just a > > preliminary version. > > > Where can I find that file? > I'll try to implement tx_timeout() http://ww

Re: d-link dfe-530 tx (bug-report)

2001-02-04 Thread Manfred Spraul
Urban Widmark wrote: > > The "transmit timed out" message is simply saying that we told the card to > send something but it hasn't generated an interrupt or anything allowing > the driver to know the packet was actually sent. > check via_rhine_tx_timeout(): the function is basically empty. > >

Re: d-link dfe-530 tx (bug-report)

2001-02-04 Thread Urban Widmark
> This sounds every much like it's related to the problems we're having with > the card not initialising on reboot from Windows. It's not the same problem. Here the card initializes just fine. And it works for a while. The "transmit timed out" message is simply saying that we told the card to

Re: d-link dfe-530 tx (bug-report)

2001-02-04 Thread hjb
Hi, >This sounds every much like it's related to the problems we're having with >the card not initialising on reboot from Windows. > >What's the bets we're looking at a new revision of the chip which VIA >haven't (publically) released documentation for yet? I'd say they're >pretty high... I had

Re: d-link dfe-530 tx (bug-report)

2001-02-04 Thread Jonathan Morton
>/var/log/messages on the linux-server with the d-link dfe-530 tx: >[THIS IS THE ERROR-MESSAGE!] >Feb 1 17:25:56 Nethost kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out >Feb 1 17:25:56 Nethost kernel: eth0: Transmit timed out, status , >PHY status 782d, resetting... &

d-link dfe-530 tx (bug-report)

2001-02-04 Thread ksa1
the d-link dfe-530 tx: [THIS IS THE ERROR-MESSAGE!] Feb 1 17:25:56 Nethost kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out Feb 1 17:25:56 Nethost kernel: eth0: Transmit timed out, status , PHY status 782d, resetting... after booting everthing is fine (..until the big smb-transfer): /var

Re: D-LINK DFE-530-TX [patch]

2000-12-14 Thread Urban Widmark
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > Becker's site http://www.scyld.com/network. > > > 2.4.x-test has some fixes for via-rhine which don't appear to have made > > > it into the Becker driver yet... > > > > Is either of these likely to make it into the stock 2.2 via-rhine? > > If someone

Re: D-LINK DFE-530-TX

2000-12-13 Thread Jeff Garzik
Simon Huggins wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 09:56:15AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Peter Horton wrote: > > > If the PCI device ID is 3065 then it's via-rhine, but not supported > > > by the driver in the kernel. Get updated via-rhine from Donald > > > Becker's site http://www.scyld.com/networ

Re: D-LINK DFE-530-TX

2000-12-13 Thread Alan Cox
> > > Becker's site http://www.scyld.com/network. > > 2.4.x-test has some fixes for via-rhine which don't appear to have made > > it into the Becker driver yet... > > Is either of these likely to make it into the stock 2.2 via-rhine? If someone ports them over for an earlyish 2.2.19pre - To unsu

Re: D-LINK DFE-530-TX

2000-12-13 Thread Simon Huggins
Hi Linux, On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 09:56:15AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Peter Horton wrote: > > If the PCI device ID is 3065 then it's via-rhine, but not supported > > by the driver in the kernel. Get updated via-rhine from Donald > > Becker's site http://www.scyld.com/network. > 2.4.x-test has

Re: D-LINK DFE-530-TX

2000-12-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
Peter Horton wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 07:44:02PM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote: > > Which ethernet module works with this card? 2.2.17 kernel > > > > If the PCI device ID is 3065 then it's via-rhine, but not supported by the > driver in the kernel. Get updated via-rhine from Donald Beck

Re: D-LINK DFE-530-TX

2000-12-07 Thread Peter Horton
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 07:44:02PM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote: > Which ethernet module works with this card? 2.2.17 kernel > If the PCI device ID is 3065 then it's via-rhine, but not supported by the driver in the kernel. Get updated via-rhine from Donald Becker's site http://www.scyld.com/net

Re: D-LINK DFE-530-TX

2000-12-07 Thread Dr. Kelsey Hudson
It uses the via-rhine driver on my system On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, James Bourne wrote: > On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote: > > > Which ethernet module works with this card? 2.2.17 kernel > > Should be the rtl8139 driver. > > Regards, > Jim > > > --

Re: D-LINK DFE-530-TX

2000-12-07 Thread James Bourne
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Marco Colombo wrote: > On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, James Bourne wrote: > > > The DFE-530TX is the viacom chipset, but the DFE530TX+ (Which I guess > > replaces the 538 as that is no longer listed on the Dlink site) is an > > rtl8139 chip. > > You mean that D-Link made a card named DFE

Re: D-LINK DFE-530-TX

2000-12-07 Thread Marco Colombo
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, James Bourne wrote: > On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > Should be the rtl8139 driver. > > > > > > AFAIK, it uses the via-rhine driver. The DFE-538TX is rtl8139 based. > > > Mike, if you have problems, search list archives: a few people (including > > > me) reporte

Re: D-LINK DFE-530-TX

2000-12-07 Thread Marco Colombo
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Should be the rtl8139 driver. > > > > AFAIK, it uses the via-rhine driver. The DFE-538TX is rtl8139 based. > > Mike, if you have problems, search list archives: a few people (including > > me) reported problems under load. I've never solved them. > > 2.

Re: D-LINK DFE-530-TX

2000-12-07 Thread James Bourne
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Should be the rtl8139 driver. > > > > AFAIK, it uses the via-rhine driver. The DFE-538TX is rtl8139 based. > > Mike, if you have problems, search list archives: a few people (including > > me) reported problems under load. I've never solved them. > > 2.2.

Re: D-LINK DFE-530-TX

2000-12-07 Thread Alan Cox
> > Should be the rtl8139 driver. > > AFAIK, it uses the via-rhine driver. The DFE-538TX is rtl8139 based. > Mike, if you have problems, search list archives: a few people (including > me) reported problems under load. I've never solved them. 2.2.18pre24 has the 8139too driver that Jeff Garzik b

Re: D-LINK DFE-530-TX

2000-12-07 Thread Marco Colombo
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, James Bourne wrote: > On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote: > > > Which ethernet module works with this card? 2.2.17 kernel > > Should be the rtl8139 driver. AFAIK, it uses the via-rhine driver. The DFE-538TX is rtl8139 based. Mike, if you have problems, search list ar

Re: D-LINK DFE-530-TX

2000-12-07 Thread James Bourne
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Mike A. Harris wrote: > Which ethernet module works with this card? 2.2.17 kernel Should be the rtl8139 driver. Regards, Jim > -- > Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate >

D-LINK DFE-530-TX

2000-12-06 Thread Mike A. Harris
Which ethernet module works with this card? 2.2.17 kernel -- Mike A. Harris - Linux advocate - Open source advocate This message is copyright 2000, all rights reserved. Views expressed are my own, not nec