On Thu, 2014-01-23 at 13:56 -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:38:33AM -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 07:46 -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 07:58 -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> > > > Replacing? Or adding to? Is BYPASS always set when DY
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 10:38:33AM -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 07:46 -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 07:58 -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> > > Replacing? Or adding to? Is BYPASS always set when DYING is set? (My
> > > guess is not but I haven't done an ex
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 07:46 -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 07:58 -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> > Replacing? Or adding to? Is BYPASS always set when DYING is set? (My
> > guess is not but I haven't done an exhaustive analysis.) So the
> > relevant code snippet in __elv_next_re
On Tue, 2014-01-21 at 07:58 -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> Replacing? Or adding to? Is BYPASS always set when DYING is set? (My
> guess is not but I haven't done an exhaustive analysis.) So the
> relevant code snippet in __elv_next_request() would be:
> if (unlikely(blk_queue_dying(
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 09:31 -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Frank.
>
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:59:36PM -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> > After investigation, it's clear that the elevator switch code is trying
> > to quiesce the request queue and sets the bypass flag. Unfortunately,
> > scsi_mode
5 matches
Mail list logo