Re: Content Of Files May Be Changed After One Disk Is Failed In RAID5

On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 14:30:56 +0800 clplayer wrote: > > --assume-clean is not safe with RAID5 unless the array actually is clean. > > It is safe with RAID1 and RAID6 due to details of the specific > > implementation. > > So I suspect that is the cause of the corruption. > > > > NeilBrown > > > >

Re: Content Of Files May Be Changed After One Disk Is Failed In RAID5

> --assume-clean is not safe with RAID5 unless the array actually is clean. > It is safe with RAID1 and RAID6 due to details of the specific implementation. > So I suspect that is the cause of the corruption. > > NeilBrown > Thank you for the information. I have removed --assume-clean in the scri

Re: Content Of Files May Be Changed After One Disk Is Failed In RAID5

On Fri, 7 Sep 2012 09:40:18 +0800 clplayer wrote: > I am stressing the RAID5 functions on my desktop. > > I installed 8 hard disks which 4 were on the internal SATA ports and > the others were connected via eSATA. > > The operating system on the desktop is Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS 64-bit. > > I have

Content Of Files May Be Changed After One Disk Is Failed In RAID5

I am stressing the RAID5 functions on my desktop. I installed 8 hard disks which 4 were on the internal SATA ports and the others were connected via eSATA. The operating system on the desktop is Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS 64-bit. I have made a script to check the files in the raid while there are disks