Re: Cleanup kbuild for aic7xxx

2001-06-22 Thread D. Stimits
"Justin T. Gibbs" wrote: > > >> >Users don't have to manually select "rebuild firmware". They can > >> >rely on the generated files already in the aic7xxx directory. This > >> >is why the option defaults to off. > > > >For the SGI patched kernels based on either 2.4.5 or 2.4.6-pre1, I have > >h

Re: Cleanup kbuild for aic7xxx

2001-06-22 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
>> >Users don't have to manually select "rebuild firmware". They can >> >rely on the generated files already in the aic7xxx directory. This >> >is why the option defaults to off. > >For the SGI patched kernels based on either 2.4.5 or 2.4.6-pre1, I have >had to manually select this for a 7892 co

Re: Cleanup kbuild for aic7xxx

2001-06-22 Thread D. Stimits
"J . A . Magallon" wrote: > > On 20010623 Keith Owens wrote: > > > >>What again are you trying to fix? It looks to me like you are simply > >>trying to make it harder for people actually working on the aic7xxx > >>driver to have proper dependencies. > > > >The patch still works for anybody chang

Re: Cleanup kbuild for aic7xxx

2001-06-22 Thread D. Stimits
Keith Owens wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:39:45 -0600, > "Justin T. Gibbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>The existing build process for aic7xxx on Linux has several problems. > >> > >>* Users have to manually select "rebuild firmware". Relying on users > >> to perform any action other than