On Aug 01, 2005 13:20 +0530, Milind Dumbare wrote:
> The diff file generated by comparing ext3/ and
> kernel/fs/checkfs/ can also be accessed from the link
> http://checkfs.linsyssoft.com/temp/
> I cleaned it, but still it has some unnecessary differences. I
> am working on that to
Hi,
This is just an intermediate diff between the original source and our
source with checkfs replaced by ext3. We will be careful about
maintaining the copyright notices when finishing this merge.
Thank you,
Milind Dumbare
(www.linsyssoft.com)
On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 06:08 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wr
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 01:20:39PM +0530, Milind Dumbare wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The diff file generated by comparing ext3/ and
> kernel/fs/checkfs/ can also be accessed from the link
> http://checkfs.linsyssoft.com/temp/
> I cleaned it, but still it has some unnecessary differences. I
>
Hi,
The diff file generated by comparing ext3/ and
kernel/fs/checkfs/ can also be accessed from the link
http://checkfs.linsyssoft.com/temp/
I cleaned it, but still it has some unnecessary differences. I
am working on that to make it more clean and will send it to u as soon
as I fi
On Monday 25 Jul 2005 6:02 pm, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 11:24:43AM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
> > On Sunday 24 Jul 2005 8:44 pm, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > > >Maybe you want to put your development machines on ext*2* while doing
> > > >this ;-). Or perhaps reiserfs/xfs/somethin
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 11:24:43AM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
> On Sunday 24 Jul 2005 8:44 pm, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > >Maybe you want to put your development machines on ext*2* while doing
> > >this ;-). Or perhaps reiserfs/xfs/something.
> >
> > Or perhaps into at the VFS level, so any fs can b
On Sunday 24 Jul 2005 8:44 pm, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >Maybe you want to put your development machines on ext*2* while doing
> >this ;-). Or perhaps reiserfs/xfs/something.
>
> Or perhaps into at the VFS level, so any fs can benefit from it.
We thought about that. While it's possible to do that,
>Maybe you want to put your development machines on ext*2* while doing
>this ;-). Or perhaps reiserfs/xfs/something.
Or perhaps into at the VFS level, so any fs can benefit from it.
Jan Engelhardt
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a me
Hi!
> Thanks for your suggestions and help.
>
> We started it from 2.6.7 last year and then it was sitting idle for several
> months for lack of resources. We'll go back to that version and generate a
> diff that's easier to read.
>
> Yes, changing the name has made the task of rebasing wrt. c
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 11:30:07AM +0530, Amit S. Kale wrote:
>
> We started it from 2.6.7 last year and then it was sitting idle for several
> months for lack of resources. We'll go back to that version and generate a
> diff that's easier to read.
>
> Yes, changing the name has made the task o
Ted,
Thanks for your suggestions and help.
We started it from 2.6.7 last year and then it was sitting idle for several
months for lack of resources. We'll go back to that version and generate a
diff that's easier to read.
Yes, changing the name has made the task of rebasing wrt. changing kerne
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 07:34:38PM +0530, Milind Dumbare wrote:
> Hi,
>
> LinSysSoft Technologies has taken up the challenge to incorporate
> Checkpoint and Block Level Incremental Backup (BLIB) support in the open
> source's Ext3 File System, which is very well known for its stability,
> t
Hi,
LinSysSoft Technologies has taken up the challenge to incorporate
Checkpoint and Block Level Incremental Backup (BLIB) support in the open
source's Ext3 File System, which is very well known for its stability,
to create a new file system called CheckFS. Block Level Incremental
Backup
13 matches
Mail list logo
