This is the sixth iteration of the updated Cedrus driver,
that supports the Video Engine found in most Allwinner SoCs, starting
with the A10. It was tested on the A13, A20, A33 and H3.
The initial version of this driver[0] was originally written and
submitted by Florent Revest using a previous
[...]
On Mon, 2018-05-07 at 14:44 +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> Remaining tasks:
> * cleaning up registers description and documenting the fields used;
> * removing the assigned-clocks property and setting the clock rate
> in the driver directly;
> * checking the series with checkpatch and f
This presents a third iteration of the updated Sunxi-Cedrus driver,
that supports the Video Engine found in most Allwinner SoCs, starting
with the A10. It was tested on the A13, A20 and A33.
The initial version of this driver[0] was originally written and
submitted by Florent Revest using a
This presents a second iteration of the updated Sunxi-Cedrus driver,
that supports the Video Engine found in most Allwinner SoCs, starting
with the A10. It was tested on both the A20 and the A33.
The initial version of this driver[0] was originally written and
submitted by Florent Revest using a
On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 11:09 +0100, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> This presents a newer version of the Sunxi-Cedrus driver, that
> supports
> the Video Engine found in most Allwinner SoCs, starting with the A10.
I had to send this series in two parts (and tried to keep them under the
origin
This presents a newer version of the Sunxi-Cedrus driver, that supports
the Video Engine found in most Allwinner SoCs, starting with the A10.
The first version of this driver[0] was originally written and submitted
by Florent Revest using a previous version of the request API, that is
necessary
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 04:36:01PM +0100, Thomas van Kleef wrote:
> > C) I'm not sure what you tried to do with the application of the
> >request API patches (such as e1ca861c168f) but we want to have the
> >whole commits in there, and not a patch adding all of them. This
> >
Hi Maxime,
>
> So there's a couple of issues with those patches (the pull request
> itself is fine though :))
>
> I'll try to break them down as much as possible.
>
> A) If you want to have proper commit logs, you will usually do two
>things: first create a commit title, which is what appear
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 03:51:14PM +0100, Thomas van Kleef wrote:
> On 28-11-17 13:26, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:20:59PM +0100, Thomas van Kleef wrote:
> >>> So, I have been rebasing to 4.14.0 and have the cedrus driver working.
> >>
Il 28/11/2017 16:17, Maxime Ripard ha scritto:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:12:31PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
And really, just develop against 4.14. sunxi-next is rebased, and it's
just not something you can base some work on.
Where do we can work on then?
Should Thomas setup his own github r
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:12:31PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> > > > And really, just develop against 4.14. sunxi-next is rebased, and it's
> > > > just not something you can base some work on.
> > >
> > > Where do we can work on then?
> > > Should Thomas setup his own github repo?
> > > What a
On 28-11-17 13:26, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:20:59PM +0100, Thomas van Kleef wrote:
>>> So, I have been rebasing to 4.14.0 and have the cedrus driver working.
>> I have pulled linux-mainline 4.14.0. Then pulled the requests2 branch from
>> Hans
&g
Il 28/11/2017 14:07, Maxime Ripard ha scritto:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
Hi,
Il giorno 28 nov 2017, alle ore 13:52, Maxime Ripard
ha scritto:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:54:08PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
Should I be working in sunxi-next I wonder?
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 02:03:43PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Il giorno 28 nov 2017, alle ore 13:52, Maxime Ripard
> > ha scritto:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:54:08PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> > Should I be working in sunxi-next I wonder?
>
> Yes, this i
Hi,
> Il giorno 28 nov 2017, alle ore 13:52, Maxime Ripard
> ha scritto:
>
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:54:08PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Should I be working in sunxi-next I wonder?
Yes, this is the best way, cedrus is very specific to sunxi.
So before working on mainli
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:54:08PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> > > > Should I be working in sunxi-next I wonder?
> > >
> > > Yes, this is the best way, cedrus is very specific to sunxi.
> > > So before working on mainline, I think the best is to work un sunxi-next
> > > branch.
> >
> > Is the
;>>> especially on the display engine side, but last time we talked
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> his
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work was not really upstreamable.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&g
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:20:59PM +0100, Thomas van Kleef wrote:
> > So, I have been rebasing to 4.14.0 and have the cedrus driver working.
> I have pulled linux-mainline 4.14.0. Then pulled the requests2 branch from
> Hans
> Verkuil's media_tree. I have a patch available
rking with A20 with kernel as is and libva as buildroot package
2nd: porting to sunxi-next branch of linux-sunxi and check libva if can work as
is
Thank you
So, I have been rebasing to 4.14.0 and have the cedrus driver working.
I have pulled linux-mainline 4.14.0. Then pulled the requests2 br
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We will also resume that effort starting next march.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it possible a preview on a separate
>>>>>&g
lly to start porting everything done by
>>>>>>>>>> FlorentRevest to mainline,
>>>>>>>>>> admitted you've not already done.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure what you're asking
check libva if can work as
is
Thank you
So, I have been rebasing to 4.14.0 and have the cedrus driver working.
I have pulled linux-mainline 4.14.0. Then pulled the requests2 branch from Hans
Verkuil's media_tree. I have a patch available of the merge between these 2
branches.
After this I
Hi Maxime,
Il 28/11/2017 09:35, Maxime Ripard ha scritto:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 01:03:59AM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
Hi Maxime,
Il 16/11/2017 14:42, Giulio Benetti ha scritto:
Hi,
Il 16/11/2017 14:39, Maxime Ripard ha scritto:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 02:17:08PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wr
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 01:03:59AM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Hi Maxime,
>
> Il 16/11/2017 14:42, Giulio Benetti ha scritto:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Il 16/11/2017 14:39, Maxime Ripard ha scritto:
> > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 02:17:08PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> > > > Hi Hans,
> > > >
> > > > I
Hi Maxime,
Il 16/11/2017 14:42, Giulio Benetti ha scritto:
Hi,
Il 16/11/2017 14:39, Maxime Ripard ha scritto:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 02:17:08PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
Hi Hans,
Il 16/11/2017 14:12, Hans Verkuil ha scritto:
On 16/11/17 13:57, Giulio Benetti wrote:
Il 16/11/2017 13:53,
Hi Nicolas,
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 02:59:55PM -0500, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> Le jeudi 16 novembre 2017 à 12:02 +0100, Maxime Ripard a écrit :
> > Assuming that the request API is in, we'd need to:
> > - Finish the MPEG4 support
> > - Work on more useful codecs (H264 comes to my mind)
>
> F
Le jeudi 16 novembre 2017 à 12:02 +0100, Maxime Ripard a écrit :
> Assuming that the request API is in, we'd need to:
> - Finish the MPEG4 support
> - Work on more useful codecs (H264 comes to my mind)
For which we will have to review the tables and make sure they match
the spec (the easy part
Hi,
Il 16/11/2017 14:39, Maxime Ripard ha scritto:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 02:17:08PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
Hi Hans,
Il 16/11/2017 14:12, Hans Verkuil ha scritto:
On 16/11/17 13:57, Giulio Benetti wrote:
Il 16/11/2017 13:53, Maxime Ripard ha scritto:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 01:30:52P
On 16/11/17 14:17, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Il 16/11/2017 14:12, Hans Verkuil ha scritto:
>> On 16/11/17 13:57, Giulio Benetti wrote:
>>> Il 16/11/2017 13:53, Maxime Ripard ha scritto:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 01:30:52PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 02:17:08PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Il 16/11/2017 14:12, Hans Verkuil ha scritto:
> > On 16/11/17 13:57, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> > > Il 16/11/2017 13:53, Maxime Ripard ha scritto:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 01:30:52PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> >
Hi Hans,
Il 16/11/2017 14:12, Hans Verkuil ha scritto:
On 16/11/17 13:57, Giulio Benetti wrote:
Il 16/11/2017 13:53, Maxime Ripard ha scritto:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 01:30:52PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:37:30AM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
Il 16/11/2017 11:31,
On 16/11/17 13:57, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Il 16/11/2017 13:53, Maxime Ripard ha scritto:
>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 01:30:52PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:37:30AM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Il 16/11/2017 11:31, Andreas Baierl ha scritto:
>> Am 16.11.201
Il 16/11/2017 13:53, Maxime Ripard ha scritto:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 01:30:52PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:37:30AM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
Il 16/11/2017 11:31, Andreas Baierl ha scritto:
Am 16.11.2017 um 11:13 schrieb Giulio Benetti:
Hello,
Hello,
I'm wo
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 01:30:52PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:37:30AM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> > > Il 16/11/2017 11:31, Andreas Baierl ha scritto:
> > > > Am 16.11.2017 um 11:13 schrieb Giulio Benetti:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > > > I'm w
Hi,
Il 16/11/2017 12:02, Maxime Ripard ha scritto:
Hi,
I'm not sure why there's so many recipients (Russell, Rob or Mark have
a limited interest in this I assume), and why you're also missing some
key ones (like the v4l2 list).
added in cc linux-media mailing list that appears to be the right
Hi,
I'm not sure why there's so many recipients (Russell, Rob or Mark have
a limited interest in this I assume), and why you're also missing some
key ones (like the v4l2 list).
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:37:30AM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Il 16/11/2017 11:31, Andreas Baierl ha scritto:
> > Am
Hi,
Il 16/11/2017 11:31, Andreas Baierl ha scritto:
Am 16.11.2017 um 11:13 schrieb Giulio Benetti:
Hello,
Hello,
I'm wondering why cedrus
https://github.com/FlorentRevest/linux-sunxi-cedrus has never been
merged with linux-sunxi sunxi-next.
Because it is not ready to be merged. It depends
Hello,
I'm wondering why cedrus
https://github.com/FlorentRevest/linux-sunxi-cedrus has never been
merged with linux-sunxi sunxi-next.
I see it seems to be dead, no commit in 1 year.
I would like to respawn it and contribute to sunxi-next,
since we need video acceleration on A20 and A33.
Bes
38 matches
Mail list logo
